A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: Contrast-detail characteristics

被引:19
作者
Suryanarayanan, S [1 ]
Karellas, A [1 ]
Vedantham, S [1 ]
Waldrop, SM [1 ]
D'Orsi, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
digital mammography; JPEG; 2000; image compression; contrast-detail; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-003-1728-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In this investigation the effect of JPEG 2000 compression on the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of digital mammography images was studied using an alternative forced choice (AFC) technique. Images of a contrast-detail phantom, acquired using a clinical full-field digital mammography system, were compressed using a commercially available software product (JPEG 2000). Data compression was achieved at ratios of 1:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 30:1 and the images were reviewed by seven observers on a high-resolution display. Psychophysical detection characteristics were first computed by fitting perception data using a maximum-likelihood technique from which CD curves were derived at 50%, 62.5%, and 75% threshold levels. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in the perception of mean disk thickness up to 20:1 compression except for disk diameter of 1 mm. All other compression combinations exhibited significant degradation in CD characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1349-1358
[2]   Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R ;
Xue, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (09) :2653-2669
[3]   Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose and image quality evaluation [J].
Boone, JM ;
Nelson, TR ;
Lindfors, KK ;
Seibert, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) :657-667
[4]   QUANTITATIVE VERSUS SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF MAMMOGRAPHY ACCREDITATION PHANTOM IMAGES [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP ;
ECKERT, MP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (02) :133-143
[5]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (FROC) DATA [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :561-568
[6]   Image compression in digital mammography: Effects on computerized detection of subtle microcalcifications [J].
Chan, HP ;
Lo, SCB ;
Niklason, LT ;
Ikeda, DM ;
Lam, KL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (08) :1325-1336
[7]   Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study [J].
Chen, B ;
Ning, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :755-770
[8]   Model observer optimization of JPEG image compression [J].
Eckstein, MP ;
Abbey, CK ;
Bartroff, JL .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 3981 :106-115
[9]   Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography of the chest [J].
Egashira, K ;
Nakata, H ;
Watanabe, H ;
Uchida, K ;
Nakamura, K ;
Ishino, Y ;
Horino, K ;
Yoshikawa, R .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1998, 11 (04) :176-181
[10]   JPEG 2000 compression of medical imagery [J].
Foos, DH ;
Muka, E ;
Slone, RM ;
Erickson, BJ ;
Flynn, MJ ;
Clunie, DA ;
Hildebrand, L ;
Kohm, K ;
Young, S .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PACS DESIGN AND EVALUATION - ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ISSUES, 2000, 3980 :85-96