BioCore Guide: A Tool for Interpreting the Core Concepts of Vision and Change for Biology Majors

被引:126
作者
Brownell, Sara E. [1 ]
Freeman, Scott [2 ]
Wenderoth, Mary Pat [2 ]
Crowe, Alison J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION | 2014年 / 13卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CURRICULUM; PHYSIOLOGY; 21ST-CENTURY; BIOCHEMISTRY; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.13-12-0233
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education outlined five core concepts intended to guide undergraduate biology education: 1) evolution; 2) structure and function; 3) information flow, exchange, and storage; 4) pathways and transformations of energy and matter; and 5) systems. We have taken these general recommendations and created a Vision and Change BioCoreGuide-a set of general principles and specific statements that expand upon the core concepts, creating a framework that biology departments can use to align with the goals of Vision and Change. We used a grassroots approach to generate the BioCore Guide, beginning with faculty ideas as the basis for an iterative process that incorporated feedback from more than 240 biologists and biology educators at a diverse range of academic institutions throughout the United States. The final validation step in this process demonstrated strong national consensus, with more than 90% of respondents agreeing with the importance and scientific accuracy of the statements. It is our hope that the BioCore Guide will serve as an agent of change for biology departments as we move toward transforming undergraduate biology education.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 211
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] The "core principles" of physiology: what should students understand?
    Michael, Joel
    Modell, Harold
    McFarland, Jenny
    Cliff, William
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2009, 33 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [22] National Research Council, 2003, BIO2010 NAT RES COUN
  • [23] Measuring Knowledge of Natural Selection: A Comparison of the CINS, an Open-Response Instrument, and an Oral Interview
    Nehm, Ross H.
    Schonfeld, Irvin Sam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2008, 45 (10) : 1131 - 1160
  • [24] Quinn H., 2011, FRAMEWORK K 12 SCI E
  • [25] The Concept Lens Diagram A NEW MECHANISM FOR PRESENTING BIOCHEMISTRY CONTENT IN TERMS OF "BIG IDEAS"
    Rowland, Susan L.
    Smith, Christopher A.
    Gillam, Elizabeth M. A.
    Wright, Tony
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2011, 39 (04) : 267 - 279
  • [26] Situating and teaching 21st century zoology: revealing pattern in the form and function of animals
    Russell, Anthony P.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2009, 4 (03): : 309 - 315
  • [27] TOWARD A CONCEPTUAL. FRAMEWORK FOR BIOLOGY
    Scheiner, Samuel M.
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2010, 85 (03) : 293 - 318
  • [28] A Diagnostic Assessment for Introductory Molecular and Cell Biology
    Shi, Jia
    Wood, William B.
    Martin, Jennifer M.
    Guild, Nancy A.
    Vicens, Quentin
    Knight, Jennifer K.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2010, 9 (04): : 453 - 461
  • [29] Restoring physiology to the undergraduate biology curriculum: A call for action
    Silverthorn, DU
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2003, 27 (03) : 91 - 96
  • [30] Development of the Biology Card Sorting Task to Measure Conceptual Expertise in Biology
    Smith, Julia I.
    Combs, Elijah D.
    Nagami, Paul H.
    Alto, Valerie M.
    Goh, Henry G.
    Gourdet, Muryam A. A.
    Hough, Christina M.
    Nickell, Ashley E.
    Peer, Adrian G.
    Coley, John D.
    Tanner, Kimberly D.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 12 (04): : 628 - 644