Differential responses of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis to acute restraint stress in Hatano high- and low-avoidance rats

被引:25
作者
Asai, S
Ohta, R
Shirota, M
Watanabe, G
Taya, K
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Dept Vet Med, Vet Physiol Lab, Fac Agr, Fuchu, Tokyo 1838509, Japan
[2] Gifu Univ, United Grad Sch Vet Sci, Dept Vet Basic Sci, Gifu 5011193, Japan
[3] Res Adm Hatano ResInst, Food & Drug Safety Ctr, Safety Testing Lab, Hatano, Kanagawa 2578523, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1677/joe.0.1810515
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The high- and low-avoidance animal (HAA and LAA respectively) strains of Hatano rats were originally selected and bred from Sprague-Dawley rats for their performance in the shuttle-box task. The present study focused on the activin, of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis of HAA and LAA rats in response to restraint stress. The restraint stress induced an elevation in plasma concentrations of ACTH, prolactin, corticosterone and progesterone. Peak levels of plasma ACTH during stress conditions were significantly higher in HAA rats than in LAA rats, while peak levels of prolactin were significantly lower in HAA rats than. in LAA rats. Under stress conditions, ACTH and prolactin synthesis in the anterior pituitary glands was significantly higher in HAA rats compared with LAA rats. The peak plasma concentrations of corticosterone, during restraint stress, were significantly higher in LAA rats compared with HAA rats. These results indicate that the response of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis to acute restraint stress is greater in HAA rats than in LAA rats, whereas the ACTH-induced adrenal response of corticosterone release is higher in LAA rats than in HAA rats. On the other hand, prolactin secretory activity is higher in LAA rats compared with HAA rats. These differences in endocrine responses to stress may be involved in the regulation of the avoidance responses in the shuttle-box task.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 520
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   EFFECT OF STRESS AND NEMBUTAL ON PLASMA LEVELS OF GONADOTROPINS AND PROLACTIN IN OVARIECTOMIZED RATS [J].
AJIKA, K ;
MCCANN, SM ;
KALRA, SP ;
FAWCETT, CP ;
KRULICH, L .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1972, 90 (03) :707-&
[2]   CORTICOTROPIN-RELEASING FACTOR AND VASOPRESSIN MESSENGER-RNA LEVELS IN ROMAN HIGH-AVOIDANCE AND LOW-AVOIDANCE RATS - RESPONSE TO OPEN-FIELD EXPOSURE [J].
AUBRY, JM ;
BARTANUSZ, V ;
DRISCOLL, P ;
SCHULZ, P ;
STEIMER, T ;
KISS, JZ .
NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 1995, 61 (02) :89-97
[3]   SELECTION FOR HIGH RATES AND LOW RATES OF AVOIDANCE CONDITIONING IN RAT [J].
BIGNAMI, G .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1965, 13 (2-3) :221-&
[4]   CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PITUITARY-ADRENAL SYSTEM IN THE SYRACUSE HIGH-AVOIDANCE AND LOW-AVOIDANCE STRAINS OF RATS (RATTUS-NORVEGICUS) [J].
BRUSH, FR ;
ISAACSON, MD ;
PELLEGRINO, LJ ;
RYKASZEWSKI, IM ;
SHAIN, CN .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1991, 21 (01) :35-48
[5]   GENETIC-DETERMINANTS OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN AVOIDANCE-LEARNING - BEHAVIORAL AND ENDOCRINE CHARACTERISTICS [J].
BRUSH, FR .
EXPERIENTIA, 1991, 47 (10) :1039-1050
[6]   GENETIC SELECTION FOR AVOIDANCE-BEHAVIOR IN THE RAT [J].
BRUSH, FR ;
FROEHLICH, JC ;
SAKELLARIS, PC .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1979, 9 (04) :309-316
[7]   MATURATION OF THE BEHAVIORAL AND NEUROENDOCRINE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ROMAN RAT LINES [J].
CASTANON, N ;
DULLUC, J ;
LEMOAL, M ;
MORMEDE, P .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 55 (04) :775-782
[8]   ADRENAL MORPHOMETRY IN UNILATERAL AND SHAM ADRENALECTOMIZED SYRACUSE HIGH AND LOW AVOIDANCE RATS [J].
DELPAINE, SN ;
BRUSH, FR .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1990, 48 (02) :299-306
[9]   Genetic selection and differential stress responses -: The Roman lines/strains of rats [J].
Driscoll, P ;
Escorihuela, RM ;
Fernández-Teruel, A ;
Giorgi, O ;
Schwegler, H ;
Steimer, T ;
Wiersma, A ;
Corda, MG ;
Flint, J ;
Koolhaas, JM ;
Langhans, W ;
Schulz, PE ;
Siegel, J ;
Tobeña, A .
STRESS OF LIFE: FROM MOLECULES TO MAN, 1998, 851 :501-510
[10]   EFFECTS OF ACUTE STRESS ON SERUM LH AND PROLACTIN IN INTACT, CASTRATE AND DEXAMETHASONE-TREATED MALE RATS [J].
EUKER, JS ;
MEITES, J ;
RIEGLE, GD .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1975, 96 (01) :85-92