Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts

被引:348
作者
Kardes, FR [1 ]
Posavac, SS
Cronley, ML
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Business, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[3] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15327663jcp1403_6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Because products are rarely described completely, consumers often form inferences that go beyond the information given. We review research on the processes, bases, and the judgment contexts in which inferences are formed. The most basic processes are induction (inferences from specific instances to general principles) versus deduction (inferences front general principles to specific instances). Stimulus-based inferences are formed on-line (as information is encountered) using situationally available information, whereas memory-based (ortheory-based) inferences are formed using prior knowledge and experience. Inferences can pertain to a single product judged in isolation (a singular judgment context) or to multiple products considered in relation to one another (a comparative judgment context). This 2 x 2 x 2(Induction vs. Deduction x Stimulus-Based vs. Memory-Based x Singular vs. Comparative Judgment) theoretical framework suggests that there are 8 different types of inferences that consumers may form. Based on this framework, we identify gaps in the literature and suggest directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 256
页数:27
相关论文
共 163 条
  • [1] CONSUMER EVALUATIONS OF BRAND EXTENSIONS
    AAKER, DA
    KELLER, KL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [2] Anderson J., 1983, The architecture of cognition
  • [3] ANDERSON NH, 1982, METHODS INFORMATIN
  • [4] ANDERSON NH, 1981, FDN INFORMATION INTE
  • [5] [Anonymous], PSYCHOL MARKETING
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1988, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, DOI [10.1002/bdm.3960010105, DOI 10.1002/bdm.3960010105]
  • [8] [Anonymous], HDB SOCIAL COGNITION
  • [9] Bargh J. A., 2000, HDB RES METHODS SOCI, P253, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996481.017
  • [10] THE BASE-RATE FALLACY IN PROBABILITY JUDGMENTS
    BARHILLEL, M
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1980, 44 (03) : 211 - 233