Towards machine learned quality control: A benchmark for sharpness quantification in digital pathology

被引:34
作者
Campanella, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
Rajanna, Arjun R. [2 ]
Corsale, Lorraine [3 ]
Schuffler, Peter J. [2 ]
Yagi, Yukako [3 ]
Fuchs, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Computational pathology; Digital pathology; Quality control; Machine learning; Deep learning; Quantitative blur detection;
D O I
10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.09.001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Pathology is on the verge of a profound change from an analog and qualitative to a digital and quantitative discipline. This change is mostly driven by the high-throughput scanning of microscope slides in modem pathology departments, reaching tens of thousands of digital slides per month. The resulting vast digital archives form the basis of clinical use in digital pathology and allow large scale machine learning in computational pathology. One of the most crucial bottlenecks of high-throughput scanning is quality control (QC). Currently, digital slides are screened manually to detected out-of-focus regions, to compensate for the limitations of scanner software. We present a solution to this problem by introducing a benchmark dataset for blur detection, an in-depth comparison of state-of-the art sharpness descriptors and their prediction performance within a random forest framework. Furthermore, we show that convolution neural networks, like residual networks, can be used to train blur detectors from scratch. We thoroughly evaluate the accuracy of feature based and deep learning based approaches for sharpness classification (99.74% accuracy) and regression (MSE 0.004) and additionally compare them to domain experts in a comprehensive human perception study. Our pipeline outputs spacial heatmaps enabling to quantify and localize blurred areas on a slide. Finally, we tested the proposed framework in the clinical setting and demonstrate superior performance over the state-of-the-art QC pipeline comprising commercial software and human expert inspection by reducing the error rate from 17% to 4.7%.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ameisen D, 2014, PROCEEDINGS IWBBIO 2014: INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P148
[2]   Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees [J].
Amit, Y ;
Geman, D .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1997, 9 (07) :1545-1588
[3]  
Batten CF, 2000, THESIS
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]   Image Sharpness Measure for Blurred Images in Frequency Domain [J].
De, Kanjar ;
Masilamani, V. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING (ICONDM2013), 2013, 64 :149-158
[6]   Whole slide imaging in pathology: advantages, limitations, and emerging perspectives [J].
Farahani, Navid ;
Parwani, Anil V. ;
Pantanowitz, Liron .
PATHOLOGY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 7 :23-33
[7]   A No-Reference Objective Image Sharpness Metric Based on the Notion of Just Noticeable Blur (JNB) [J].
Ferzli, Rony ;
Karam, Lina J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2009, 18 (04) :717-728
[8]   COMPARISON OF AUTOFOCUS METHODS FOR AUTOMATED MICROSCOPY [J].
FIRESTONE, L ;
COOK, K ;
CULP, K ;
TALSANIA, N ;
PRESTON, K .
CYTOMETRY, 1991, 12 (03) :195-206
[9]   Computational pathology: Challenges and promises for tissue analysis [J].
Fuchs, Thomas J. ;
Buhmann, Joachim M. .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2011, 35 (7-8) :515-530
[10]   Digital Imaging in Pathology: Whole-Slide Imaging and Beyond [J].
Ghaznavi, Farzad ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Madabhushi, Anant ;
Feldman, Michael .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PATHOLOGY: MECHANISMS OF DISEASE, VOL 8, 2013, 8 :331-359