Evaluation of water gargle samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection using Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 assay

被引:2
作者
Levesque, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Beauchemin, Stephanie [3 ]
Vallee, Maud [4 ]
Longtin, Jean [5 ,6 ]
Jacob-Wagner, Marieve [5 ]
Dumaresq, Jeannot [5 ,7 ]
Dulcey, Carlos [3 ]
Labbe, Annie-Claude [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] CIUSSS Estrie Ctr Hosp Univ Sherbrooke, Microbiol Serv, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Microbiol & Infectiol, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Lab Biol Med, Grappe Optilab CHUM, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Inst Natl Sante Publ Quebec, Lab Sante Publ Quebec, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Ctr Hosp Univ CHU Quebec Univ Laval, Dept Microbiol & Infectiol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol Infectiol & Immunol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[7] CISSS Chaudiere Appalaches, Dept Microbiol & Infectiol, Levis, PQ, Canada
[8] Univ Montreal, Dept Microbiol Infectiol & Immunol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[9] CIUSSS Est de Ile de Montreal, Serv Malad Infect, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Abbott ID NOW; COVID-19; gargle; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.27847
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The Abbott ID NOW (TM) COVID-19 assay has been shown as a reliable and sensitive alternative to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing from nasopharyngeal or nasal samples in symptomatic patients. Water gargle is an acceptable noninvasive alternative specimen for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection by RT-PCR. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of water gargle samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using the ID NOW. Residual gargle samples were randomly selected among positive standard of care (SOC)-nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) samples. For testing on ID NOW, the manufacturer's instructions were followed, except for the specimen addition step: 500 mu l of the gargle specimen was added to the blue sample receiver with a pipette and gently mixed. Among the 202 positive samples by SOC-NAAT, 185 were positive by ID NOW (positive percent agreement [PPA]) = 91.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.9-95.0). For the 17 discordant samples, cycle threshold (C-t) values were all >= 31.0. The PPA was significantly lower among asymptomatic patients (84.4%; 95% CI: 73.2-92.3) versus symptomatic patients (95.2%; 95% CI: 89.8-98.2). The performance of the ID NOW for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection on gargle samples is excellent when C-t values are <31.0 and for patients that have COVID-19 compatible symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:4522 / 4527
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ID NOWTM COVID19 PRO
[2]   Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Cobas® 6800/8800 system on gargle samples using two sample processing methods with combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab [J].
Benoit, Patrick ;
Labbe, Annie-Claude ;
Lalancette, Linda ;
Gagnon, Simon ;
Bonneau, Eric ;
Lavallee, Christian ;
Roger, Michel ;
Fafard, Judith ;
Dumaresq, Jeannot ;
Beauchemin, Stephanie ;
Coutlee, Francois .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (12) :6837-6840
[3]  
Bergevin Marco Andres, 2021, J Med Microbiol, V70, DOI 10.1099/jmm.0.001404
[4]   Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Review) [J].
Dinnes, Jacqueline ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Adriano, Ada ;
Berhane, Sarah ;
Davenport, Clare ;
Dittrich, Sabine ;
Emperador, Devy ;
Takwoingi, Yemisi ;
Cunningham, Jane ;
Beese, Sophie ;
Dretzke, Janine ;
di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante ;
Harris, Isobel M. ;
Price, Malcolm J. ;
Taylor-Phillips, Sian ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Spijker, Rene ;
Van den Bruel, Ann .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (08)
[5]   Natural spring water gargle and direct RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID-SPRING study) [J].
Dumaresq, Jeannot ;
Coutlee, Francois ;
Dufresne, Philippe J. ;
Longtin, Jean ;
Fafard, Judith ;
Bestman-Smith, Julie ;
Bergevin, Marco ;
Vallieres, Emilie ;
Desforges, Marc ;
Labbe, Annie-Claude .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 144
[6]   Accuracy and Discomfort of Different Types of Intranasal Specimen Collection Methods for Molecular Influenza Testing in Emergency Department Patients [J].
Frazee, Bradley W. ;
de la Guardia, Amparo Rodriguez-Hoces ;
Alter, Harrison ;
Chen, Carol G. ;
Fuentes, Eugenia L. ;
Holzer, Alison K. ;
Lolas, Macarena ;
Mitra, Debkishore ;
Vohra, Jaspreet ;
Dekker, Cornelia L. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 71 (04) :509-517
[7]   Clinical and operational impact of rapid point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection in an emergency department [J].
Gerlier, Camille ;
Pilmis, Benoit ;
Ganansia, Olivier ;
Le Monnier, Alban ;
Van, Jean-Claude Nguyen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 :713-718
[8]  
Goupil-Sormany Isabelle, 2021, Can Commun Dis Rep, V47, P534, DOI 10.14745/ccdr.v47i12a04
[9]   Evaluation of observed and unobserved self-collection of saline gargle samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in outpatients [J].
Kinshella, Mai-Lei Woo ;
Tilley, Peter ;
Al-Rawahi, Ghada N. ;
Srigley, Jocelyn A. ;
Kayda, Iryna ;
Canes, Mitchell ;
McLennan, Meghan ;
Bone, Jeffrey N. ;
Dittrick, Michelle ;
Gadkar, Vijay J. ;
Hoang, Linda M. N. ;
Goldfarb, David M. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 102 (02)
[10]   Self-Collected Samples to Detect SARS-CoV-2: Direct Comparison of Saliva, Tongue Swab, Nasal Swab, Chewed Cotton Pads and Gargle Lavage [J].
Kohmer, Niko ;
Eckermann, Lisa ;
Boeddinghaus, Boris ;
Goetsch, Udo ;
Berger, Annemarie ;
Herrmann, Eva ;
Kortenbusch, Marhild ;
Tinnemann, Peter ;
Gottschalk, Rene ;
Hoehl, Sebastian ;
Ciesek, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (24)