Environmental efficiency of disaggregated energy R&D expenditures in OECD: a bootstrap DEA approach

被引:47
作者
Kocak, Emrah [1 ]
Kinaci, Harun [2 ]
Shehzad, Khurram [3 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-38039 Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, TR-38039 Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Sustainable environment; Environmental efficiency; Energy R& D expenditures; CO2; emissions; Bootstrap DEA; CO2 EMISSIONS REDUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INNOVATION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; ECONOMY; DEMAND; MODELS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-12132-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two essential topics of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are accessible which are clean energy (SDG-7) and climate change action (SDG-13). Developments and innovations in energy technologies play an essential role in achieving these goals. Therefore, any country should use energy R&D expenditures, which are the primary source of energy innovation, most optimally. This paper aims to investigate the environmental efficiency of R&D expenditures for energy efficiency, renewable energy, hydro and fuel cells, fossil energy, nuclear energy, and other power and storage technologies in OECD countries using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and bootstrap DEA. Estimation findings indicate that only the USA ensures the environmental efficiency in energy R&D expenditures among OECD countries. Although Japan, Canada, France, Germany, and Italy cannot provide environmental efficiency in energy R&D, their scores are very close to the efficiency frontier. Portugal, Hungary, and Slovak Republic are the countries with the lowest environmental efficiency in energy R&D expenditures. At the end of the investigation, this paper also provides an empirical estimation of the extent to which inefficient countries should change their R&D spending to achieve efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:19381 / 19390
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [11] Why nuclear energy is sustainable and has to be part of the energy mix
    Brook, Barry W.
    Alonso, Agustin
    Meneley, Daniel A.
    Misak, Jozef
    Blees, Tom
    van Erp, Jan B.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 1-2 : 8 - 16
  • [12] Which type of energy drove industrial growth in the US from 2000 to 2018?
    Bulut, Umit
    Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2019, 5 : 425 - 430
  • [13] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [14] Analysis of the rebound effects of fossil and nonfossil energy in China based on sustainable development
    Chen, Jiandong
    Gao, Ming
    Li, Ding
    Song, Malin
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 28 (01) : 235 - 246
  • [15] Fossil energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction performance, and dynamic change in performance considering renewable energy input
    Chen, Weidong
    Geng, Wenxin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 120 : 283 - 292
  • [16] A novel decomposition analysis of green patent applications for the evaluation of R&D efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from fossil fuel energy consumption
    Cho, Joon Hyung
    Sohn, So Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 193 : 290 - 299
  • [17] Towards a European R&D incentive? An assessment of R&D provisions under a common corporate tax base
    d'Andria, Diego
    Pontikakis, Dimitrios
    Skonieczna, Agnieszka
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 27 (5-6) : 531 - 550
  • [18] The nexus between tourism, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions: contemporary evidence from OECD countries
    Dogru, Tarik
    Bulut, Umit
    Kocak, Emrah
    Isik, Cem
    Suess, Courtney
    Sirakaya-Turk, Ercan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (32) : 40930 - 40948
  • [19] Understanding drivers of energy efficiency changes in China
    Du, Huibin
    Matisoff, Daniel C.
    Wang, Yangyang
    Liu, Xi
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 : 1196 - 1206
  • [20] Dudley B., 2017, BP energy outlook