Energy planning of renewable applications in high-rise residential buildings integrating battery and hydrogen vehicle storage

被引:101
作者
Liu, Jia [1 ]
Cao, Sunliang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xi [3 ,5 ]
Yang, Hongxing [1 ]
Peng, Jinqing [4 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Renewable Energy Res Grp RERG, Kowloon, Dept Bldg Serv Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Inst Sustainable Urban Dev RISUD, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[4] Hunan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[5] Open Univ Hong Kong, Sch Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Solar photovoltaic; Wind turbine; Battery storage; Hydrogen vehicle; High-rise building; Energy planning; POWER-SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; PV; PERFORMANCE; ELECTRICITY; DESIGN; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116038
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study presents a robust energy planning approach for hybrid photovoltaic and wind energy systems with battery and hydrogen vehicle storage technologies in a typical high-rise residential building considering different vehicle-to-building schedules. Multiple design criteria including the supply performance, grid integration and lifetime net present value are adopted to size the hybrid system and select the optimal energy management strategy. Four decision-making strategies are further applied to search the final optimum solution for major stakeholders with different preferences. The study result indicates that the energy management strategy with battery storage prior to hydrogen storage is suitable for hybrid systems with large photovoltaic, wind and battery installation capacities to achieve the optimum supply-grid integration-economy performance. The energy management strategy with hydrogen storage prior to battery storage has a wider applicability, and this strategy should be selected when focusing on the supply-grid integration or supply-economy performance. The annual average self-consumption ratio, load cover ratio and hydrogen system efficiency are about 84.79%, 76.11% and 77.06% respectively in the end-user priority case. The annual absolute net grid exchange is about 4.55 MWh in the transmission system operator priority case. The lifetime net present value of the investor priority case is about 3.64 million US$, 29.88% less than the equivalent priority case. Final optimum solutions show positive environmental impacts with negative annual carbon emissions. Such a techno-economic-environmental feasibility analysis of the hybrid system provides major stakeholders with valuable energy planning references to promote renewable applications in urban areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Advanced Fuel Cells Technology Collaboration Programme, 2019, AFC TCP SURV NUMB FU
[2]   Techno-economic assessment and optimization of a hybrid renewable co-supply of electricity, heat and hydrogen system to enhance performance by recovering excess electricity for a large energy consumer [J].
Akhtari, Mohammad Reza ;
Baneshi, Mehdi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 188 :131-141
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STAND BLOCK TYP FLOO
[4]   Transient simulation modelling and energy performance of a standalone solar-hydrogen combined heat and power system integrated with solar-thermal collectors [J].
Assaf, Jihane ;
Shabani, Bahman .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 178 :66-77
[5]  
Baldwin D., 2017, Development of High Pressure Hydrogen Storage Tank for Storage and Gaseous Truck Delivery
[6]   Whole building optimization of a residential home with PV and battery storage in The Bahamas [J].
Bingham, Raymond D. ;
Agelin-Chaab, Martin ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 132 :1088-1103
[7]  
Bruce S, 2018, National Hydrogen Roadmap
[8]   Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review [J].
Buttler, Alexander ;
Spliethoff, Hartmut .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :2440-2454
[9]  
California Fuel Cell Partnership, 2018, CAL FUEL CELL REV VI
[10]  
Campbell M., 2008, White paper