Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems

被引:12
作者
Lebel, Louis
Anderies, John M.
Campbell, Bruce
Folke, Carl
Hatfield-Dodds, Steve
Hughes, Terry P.
Wilson, James
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] No Terr Univ, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
[3] Stockholm Univ, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[5] Univ Maine, Orono, ME 04469 USA
关键词
governance; resilience; adaptive capacity; institutions; accountability; deliberation; participation; social justice; polycentric institutions; multilayered institutions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: ( 1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; ( 2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and ( 3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Institutional adaptation to environmental risk under the transition in Vietnam [J].
Adger, WN .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2000, 90 (04) :738-758
[2]  
Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001]
[3]  
Agrawal A, 1999, J DEV AREAS, V33, P473
[4]  
Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[5]  
[Anonymous], GLOBAL CHANGE MOUNTA
[6]  
[Anonymous], LEARN MAN GLOB ENV R
[7]  
[Anonymous], COMPUS RENDUS GEOSCI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Justice, Society and Nature
[9]  
[Anonymous], SUSTAINABLE DEV BIOS, DOI DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0134639
[10]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL JUSTICE MATTE