Diagnostic value of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the assessment of disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus:: A prospective study comparing anti-nucleosome with anti-dsDNA antibodies

被引:0
作者
Gutierrez-Adrianzen, Oswaldo Augusto
Koutouzov, Sophie
Salani Mota, Rosa Maria
das Chagas Medeiros, Marta Maria
Bach, Jean-Francois
Campos, Henry de Holanda
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Stat, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[3] INSERM, U131, Inst Paris Sud Cytokines, Clamart, France
[4] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, INSERM, Paris, France
关键词
anti-nucleosome antibodies; anti-dsDNA antibodies; lupus nephritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; disease activity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the assessment of clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and active nephritis. Methods. A 12 month prospective study of 87 patients diagnosed with SLE. At each evaluation, disease activity was scored by SLE Disease Activity Index and Lupus Activity Criteria Count, and blood samples were collected for laboratory tests. Autoantibodies were detected by ELISA. Results. Nearly all patients were female (96.6%). The mean age was 33 years and the mean disease duration was 60.7 months. About half the patients presented with nephritis (49.4%) and active SLE (50.6%) at the first clinical examination. During the study period, the prevalence of active SLE decreased from 50.6% to 29.1%. The prevalence of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies was 40.0%-58.6% and 10.9%-21.8%, respectively, throughout the study period. The sensitivity of antinucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies for active SLE was 72.7%-100% and 31.3%-54.8%, respectively. The specificity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies for active SLE was 66.7%-83.7% and 88.7%-100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-nucleosome antibodies for active nephritis were 32.0%-67.5% and 46.2%-67.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for anti-dsDNA antibodies for active nephritis were 16.0%-35.4% and 85.1-97.5%, respectively. Conclusion. Anti-nucleosome antibodies are more sensitive than anti-dsDNA antibodies to active SLE and active nephritis. Thus, anti-nucleosome antibody reactivity may be a useful marker in the diagnosis and assessment of active SLE.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1544
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Circulating plasma levels of nucleosomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus - Correlation with serum antinucleosome antibody titers and absence of clear association with disease activity [J].
Amoura, Z ;
Piette, JC ;
Chabre, H ;
Cacoub, P ;
Papo, T ;
Wechsler, B ;
Bach, JF ;
Koutouzov, S .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1997, 40 (12) :2217-2225
[2]   NUCLEOSOME-RESTRICTED ANTIBODIES ARE DETECTED BEFORE ANTI-DSDNA AND/OR ANTIHISTONE ANTIBODIES IN SERUM OF MRL-MP LPR/LPR AND +/+-MICE, AND ARE PRESENT IN KIDNEY ELUATES OF LUPUS MICE WITH PROTEINURIA [J].
AMOURA, Z ;
CHABRE, H ;
KOUTOUZOV, S ;
LOTTON, C ;
CABRESPINES, A ;
BACH, JF ;
JACOB, L .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1994, 37 (11) :1684-1688
[3]   APPEARANCE OF ANTI-NUCLEOSOME ANTIBODIES PRECEDES THE APPEARANCE OF ANTI-DOUBLE STRAND DNA AND ANTI-HISTONES DURING MURINE LUPUS [J].
AMOURA, Z ;
CHABRE, H ;
BACH, JF ;
JACOB, L .
REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 1993, 14 (10) :980-980
[4]  
Amoura Z, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P76, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200001)43:1<76::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-I
[6]   The role of nucleosomes in lupus [J].
Amoura, Z ;
Koutouzov, S ;
Piette, JG .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2000, 12 (05) :369-373
[7]   Disease activity and antinucleosome antibodies in systemic 1upus erythematosus [J].
Benucci, M ;
Gobbi, FL ;
Del Rosso, A ;
Cesaretti, S ;
Niccoli, L ;
Cantini, F .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 32 (01) :42-45
[8]   Lupus nephritis - Discussion [J].
Berden, JHM ;
Madias, NE ;
Broumand, B ;
Klinger, M ;
Sonkodi, S ;
Nayak, KS ;
Hruby, Z .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 52 (02) :538-558
[9]  
Bruns A, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P2307, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200010)43:10<2307::AID-ANR19>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-J