Refinement and Evaluation of a Chinese and Western Medication Adherence Scale for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Item Response Theory Analyses

被引:5
作者
Huang, Qiong [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Li [1 ]
Xia, Bing-qing [1 ]
Zhang, Ding-jun [1 ]
Dong, Chen-di [1 ]
Tan, Jiao-wang [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Li-zhe [4 ]
Tang, Fang [4 ]
Zhang, Xian-long [1 ]
Lao, Bei-ni [1 ]
Xu, Yan-min [1 ]
Chen, Hui-fen [1 ]
Liu, Xu-sheng [5 ]
Wu, Yi-fan [5 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Clin Coll 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Heyuan Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Blood Purificat Ctr, Heyuan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Shenzhen Hosp, Renal Div, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Guangdong Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Chron Dis Management Outpatient Dept, Affiliated Hosp 2, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Guangdong Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Renal Div, Affiliated Hosp 2, 111 Dade Rd, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
chronic kidney disease; traditional Chinese medicine; medication adherence scale; item response theory; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S269255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to simplify the version-1 Chinese and Western medication adherence scale for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to a version-2 scale using item response theory (IRT) analyses, and to further evaluate the performance of the version-2 scale. Materials and Methods: Firstly, we refined the version-1 scale using IRT analyses to examine the discrimination parameter (a), difficulty parameter (b) and maximum information function peak (Imax). The final scale refinement from version-1 to version-2 scale was also decided upon clinical considerations. Secondly, we analyzed the reliability and validity of version-2 scale using classical test theory (CTT), as well as difficulty, discrimination and Imax of version-1 and version-2 scale using IRT in order to conduct scale evaluation. Results: For scale refinement, the 26-item version-1 scale was reduced to a 15-item version-2 scale after IRT analyses. For scale evaluation using CTT, internal consistency reliability (total Cronbach alpha = 0.842) and test-rest reliability (r = 0.909) of version-2 scale were desirable. Content validity indicated 3 components of knowledge, belief and behaviors. We found meritorious construct validity with 3 detected components as the same construct of medication knowledge (items 1-9), medication behavior (items 13-15), and medication belief (items 10-12) based upon exploratory factor analysis. The correlation between the version-2 scale and Morisky, Green and Levine scale (MGL scale) was weak (Pearson coefficient = 0.349). For scale evaluation with IRT, the findings showed enhanced discrimination and decreased difficulty of most retained items (items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15), decreased Imax of items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 11, 14, as well as increased Imax of items 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 in the version-2 scale than in the version-1 scale. Conclusion: The original Chinese and Western medication adherence scale was refined to a 15-item version-2 scale after IRT analyses. The scale evaluation using CTT and IRT showed the version-2 scale had the desirable reliability, validity, discrimination, difficulty, and information providedoverall. Therefore, the version-2 scale is clinically feasible to assess the medication adherence of CKD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2252
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ANN M MID S ED RES A
[2]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[3]  
Bouldin CM, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V3, P201, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1600-0447.2004.00350.X
[4]   Generalizability theory: A practical guide to study design, implementation, and interpretation [J].
Briesch, Amy M. ;
Swaminathan, Hariharan ;
Welsh, Megan ;
Chafouleas, Sandra M. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 52 (01) :13-35
[5]  
Dai JM, 2000, CHIN J PREVENT CONTR, V8, P143
[6]   Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement [J].
Edelen, Maria Orlando ;
Reeve, Bryce B. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (Suppl 1) :5-18
[7]   Item response theory and classical test theory: An empirical comparison of their item/person statistics [J].
Fan, XT .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1998, 58 (03) :357-381
[9]   Simple Structure Detection Through Bayesian Exploratory Multidimensional IRT Models [J].
Fontanella, Lara ;
Fontanella, Sara ;
Valentini, Pasquale ;
Trendafilov, Nickolay .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (01) :100-112
[10]  
Glanz K., 2008, Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, V4