Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation

被引:1393
作者
Gawer, Annabelle [1 ]
Cusumano, Michael A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Business, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] MIT, Engn Syst Div, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
DOMINANT DESIGNS; VALUE CREATION; COMPETITION; STRATEGIES; EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; MARKETS; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/jpim.12105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper brings together the recent literature on industry platforms and shows how it relates to managing innovation within and outside the firm as well as to dealing with technological and market disruptions and change over time. First, we identify distinct types of platforms. Our analysis of a wide range of industry examples suggests that there are two predominant types of platforms: internal or company-specific platforms, and external or industry-wide platforms. We define internal (company or product) platforms as a set of assets organized in a common structure from which a company can efficiently develop and produce a stream of derivative products. We define external (industry) platforms as products, services, or technologies that act as a foundation upon which external innovators, organized as an innovative business ecosystem, can develop their own complementary products, technologies, or services. Second, we summarize from the literature general propositions on the design, economics, and strategic management of platforms. Third, we review the case of Intel and other examples to illustrate the range of technological, strategic, and business challenges that platform leaders and their competitors face as markets and technologies evolve. Finally, we identify practices associated with effective platform leadership and avenues for future research to deepen our understanding of this important phenomenon and what firms can do to manage platform-related competition and innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 433
页数:17
相关论文
共 96 条
[71]   Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design [J].
Parker, GG ;
Van Alstyne, MW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (10) :1494-1504
[72]   The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership [J].
Perrons, Robert K. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (08) :1300-1312
[73]   How to capture value from innovation: Shaping intellectual property and industry architecture [J].
Pisano, Gary P. ;
Teece, David J. .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 50 (01) :278-+
[74]   Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences [J].
Powell, WW ;
White, DR ;
Koput, KW ;
Owen-Smith, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 110 (04) :1132-1205
[75]  
Robertson D, 1998, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V39, P19
[76]   Two-sided markets: a progress report [J].
Rochet, Jean-Charles ;
Tirole, Jean .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) :645-667
[77]   PLATFORM COMPETITION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS [J].
Rochet, Jean-Charles ;
Tirole, Jean .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 1 (04)
[78]   DIRECTION OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE - INDUCEMENT MECHANISMS AND FOCUSING DEVICES [J].
ROSENBERG, N .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1969, 18 (01) :1-24
[79]   TECHNOLOGICAL PIONEERING AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - THE BIRTH OF THE VCR INDUSTRY [J].
ROSENBLOOM, RS ;
CUSUMANO, MA .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1987, 29 (04) :51-76
[80]  
Rothwell R., 1990, Design Management, P279