Spatial-temporal evolution and regional difference decomposition of urban environmental governance efficiency in China

被引：23
作者：
Peng, Geng [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodan [2 ]
Liu, Fang [1 ]
Ruan, Lijuan [3 ]
Tian, Kaiyou [3 ]
机构：
[1] Jiangsu Univ Technol, Business Sch, Changzhou 213001, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Business Sch, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
[3] Changzhou Univ, Shiliang Law Sch, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源：
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY | 2021年 / 23卷 / 06期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Regional difference; Urban environmental; Governance efficiency; Three-stage DEA method; Super-SBM; DagumGini ratio; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; INDUSTRY;
D O I：
10.1007/s10668-020-01007-2
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
The three-stage DEA method and super-SBM are combined to measure the urban environmental governance efficiency of 30 provinces in China from 2004 to 2016. Then, ArcGIS software is used to illustrate the spatial-temporal evolution of urban environmental governance efficiency, and DagumGiniratio is calculated to show the regional difference. The results indicate that the provinces characterized by high or low environmental governance efficiency are shown to cluster in space over time, and the spatial dependence of the environmental governance behavior of government is the greatest source of the regional difference of urban environmental governance efficiency. Our findings imply that the environmental governance behavior of government is spatial dependent, which highlights that the policies for improve environmental governance efficiency should be made globally.
引用
收藏
页码：8974 / 8990
页数：17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Assessment of an air pollution event in the southwestern Iberian Peninsula
    Adame, J. A.
    Hernandez-Ceballos, M. A.
    Bolivar, J. P.
    De la Morena, B.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 55 : 245 - 256
  • [2] Aigner D., 1977, Journal of Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
  • [3] A General Mathematical Framework for Calculating Systems-Scale Efficiency of Energy Extraction and Conversion: Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Other Energy Return Ratios
    Brandt, Adam R.
    Dale, Michael
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2011, 4 (08): : 1211 - 1245
  • [4] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [5] Cole MA, 2007, BE J ECON ANAL POLI, V7
  • [6] Dagum C., 1997, Empirical Economics, V22, P515, DOI [10.1007/bf01205777, 10.1007/BF01205777, DOI 10.1007/BF01205777]
  • [7] Inspections, pollution prices, and environmental performance: evidence from China
    Dasgupta, S
    Laplante, B
    Mamingi, N
    Wang, H
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (03) : 487 - 498
  • [8] Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis
    Fried, HO
    Lovell, CAK
    Schmidt, SS
    Yaisawarng, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (1-2) : 157 - 174
  • [9] DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries
    Goto, Mika
    Otsuka, Akihiro
    Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 66 : 535 - 549
  • [10] The Role of Public Participation in Environmental Governance: Empirical Evidence from China
    Guo, Jin
    Bai, Junhong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (17)
123