Impaired lexical selection and fluency in post-stroke aphasia

被引:7
作者
Botezatu, Mona Roxana [1 ]
Mirman, Daniel [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 301 Lewis Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Moss Rehabil Res Inst, Elkins Pk, PA USA
关键词
Spoken word recognition; phonological neighborhood density; fluency; lexical selection; aphasia; SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; BROCAS AREA; SPEECH; ACCESS; ORGANIZATION; SIMILARITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/02687038.2018.1508637
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Deficits in fluent language production are a hallmark of aphasia and may arise from impairments at different levels in the language system. It has been proposed that difficulty resolving lexical competition contributes to fluency deficits.Aims: The present study tested this hypothesis in a novel way: by examining whether narrative speech production fluency is associated with difficulty resolving lexical competition in spoken word recognition as measured by sensitivity to phonological neighborhood density.Methods & Procedures: Nineteen participants with aphasia and 15 neurologically intact older adults identified spoken words that varied in phonological neighborhood density and were presented in moderate noise.Outcomes & Results: Neurologically intact participants exhibited the standard inhibitory effect of phonological neighborhood density on response times: slower recognition of spoken words from denser neighborhoods. Among participants with aphasia, the inhibitory effect of phonological neighborhood density (less accurate recognition of spoken words from denser neighborhoods) was smaller for participants with greater fluency. The neighborhood effect was larger for participants with greater receptive vocabulary knowledge, indicating that the fluency effect was not a result of general lexical deficits.Conclusions: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that impaired lexical selection is a contributing factor in fluency deficits in poststroke aphasia.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 688
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, PALPA PSYCHOLINGUIST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
[3]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[4]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[5]   Language Learning and Control in Monolinguals and Bilinguals [J].
Bartolotti, James ;
Marian, Viorica .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 36 (06) :1129-1147
[6]  
Bates D., 2016, R package 'lme4', V1, P1
[7]  
Berndt R.S., 2000, QUANTITATIVE PRODUCT
[8]   Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control [J].
Bialystok, Ellen ;
Craik, Fergus I. M. ;
Luk, Gigi .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2008, 21 (06) :522-538
[9]  
Botezatu M. R., 2015, P 37 ANN M COGN SCI, P250, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.2167.0245, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2167.0245]
[10]  
Caplan D., 2011, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, P22