After Kittler: On the Cultural Techniques of Recent German Media Theory

被引:43
作者
Geoghegan, Bernard Dionysius [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Kulturwissensch, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
agriculture; biopolitics; German media theory; Kittler; media archaeology;
D O I
10.1177/0263276413488962
中图分类号
G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;
摘要
This paper offers a brief introduction and interpretation of recent research on cultural techniques (or Kulturtechnikforschung) in German media studies. The analysis considers three sites of conceptual dislocations that have shaped the development and legacy of media research often associated with theorist Friedrich Kittler: first, the displacement of 1980s and 1990s Kittlerian media theory towards a more praxeological style of analysis in the early 2000s; second, the philological background that allowed the antiquated German appellation for agricultural engineering, Kulturtechniken, to migrate into media and cultural studies; and third, the role of these conceptual dislocations in enriching media-genealogical inquiries into topics such as life, biopolitics, and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 82
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, J COMMUN INQ, DOI DOI 10.1177/019685998801200202
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ECCE HOMO
[3]  
Bohme H., 1996, KULTURWISSENSCHAFT L, P46
[4]  
Deleuze G., 2015, WHAT IS PHILOS
[5]  
ENGELL L, 2010, Z MEDIEN KULTURFORSC, V1
[6]  
Foucault Michel., 1978, SECURITY TERRITORY P
[7]  
Fritz Angela, 1986, LESEN BEDEUTUNG KULT
[8]  
Geoghegan B. D., 2011, MOMENT CRITICAL INQU
[9]  
Heidegger Martin., 1977, The question concerning technology and other essays
[10]  
Herf Jeffrey., 1984, REACTIONARY MODERNIS