Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice

被引:18
作者
Halkiadakis, Ioannis [1 ]
Patsea, Eleni [1 ]
Chatzimichali, Katerina [1 ]
Skouriotis, Sotiris [1 ]
Chalkidou, Sonia [1 ]
Amariotakis, Georgios [1 ]
Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios [1 ]
Theodossiadis, George [1 ]
Amariotakis, Apostolos [1 ]
Georgopoulos, Gerasimos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ophthalmiatr Athinon Athens Eye Hosp, Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Athens, Dept Ophthalmol, Athens Med Sch, Athens, Greece
关键词
central corneal thickness; dynamic contour tonometry; glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometry; ocular hypertension; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OCULAR PULSE AMPLITUDE; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; AGREEMENT; TONOPEN; EYES; IOP;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT). Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 +/- 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 +/- 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range - 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman's rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 +/- 39 mu m, range 458-656 mu m). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = - 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = - 0.106, p = 0.292). In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 328
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Altman DG., 1996, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, V7th
[2]   Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness [J].
Argus, WA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) :1810-1812
[3]   Clinical comparison of the measurement of the IOP with the ocular blood flow tonometer, the Tonopen XL and the Goldmann applanation tonometer [J].
Bafa, M ;
Lambrinakis, I ;
Dayan, M ;
Birch, M .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 79 (01) :15-18
[4]   Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects [J].
Barleon, Lorenz ;
Hoffmann, Esther M. ;
Berres, Manfred ;
Pfeiffer, Norbert ;
Grus, Franz H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (04) :583-590
[5]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: A review and meta-analysis approach [J].
Doughty, MJ ;
Zaman, ML .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 (05) :367-408
[8]   Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness [J].
Doyle, A ;
Lachkar, Y .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2005, 14 (04) :288-292
[9]   Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements [J].
Duba, I ;
Wirthlin, AC .
KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2004, 221 (05) :347-350
[10]  
EHLERS N, 1975, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V53, P34