Propofol-sufentanil anesthesia for thyroid surgery: Optimal concentrations for hemodynamic and electroencephalogram stability, and recovery features

被引:29
作者
Hentgen, E
Houfani, M
Billard, V
Capron, F
Ropars, JM
Travagli, JP
机构
[1] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Anesthesie, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[2] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Surg, F-94805 Villejuif, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200209000-00019
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Hypnotics and opioids interact synergistically to block responses to surgery and different dose combinations may be used to provide adequate anesthesia. In this study, we sought to determine the optimal concentrations of propofol and sufentanil, given by target-controlled infusions, to ensure hemodynamic stability, adequate hypnosis (assessed by electroencephalogram bispectral index(TM)), and fast recovery for a moderately painful operation. Forty-five patients, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing thyroidectomy, were randomly assigned to a sufentanil target concentration (STC) that was maintained throughout surgery (0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 ng/mL). The propofol target concentration was adjusted to keep mean arterial blood pressure within 30% of a reference value, and bispectral index(TM) between 40 and 60. Adequate anesthesia was obtained in all groups. Hypertension and clinically dangerous movements were more frequent with the small STC, and hypotension requiring treatment was more frequent with the large STC. Propofol target concentration during surgery decreased significantly with increasing STC (median at thyroid removal 5.0, 4.0, and 2.5 Cg/mL, respectively) as well as the propofol consumption (740, 668, 474 mg/h). The 0.3 ng/mL STC significantly delayed the return of spontaneous breathing.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 605
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Billard V, 2001, ANN FR ANESTH, V20, P763
[2]   INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL USING A TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION SYSTEM [J].
CHAUDHRI, S ;
WHITE, M ;
KENNY, GNC .
ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 47 (07) :551-553
[3]  
FISHER DM, 1994, ANESTHESIA
[4]   LINEARITY OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND MODEL ESTIMATION OF SUFENTANIL [J].
GEPTS, E ;
SHAFER, SL ;
CAMU, F ;
STANSKI, DR ;
WOESTENBORGHS, R ;
VANPEER, A ;
HEYKANTS, JJP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (06) :1194-1204
[5]   QUALITY OF ANESTHESIA DURING SPONTANEOUS RESPIRATION - A PROPOSED SCORING SYSTEM [J].
GLEN, JB .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (12) :1081-1082
[6]   The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation [J].
Guignard, B ;
Menigaux, C ;
Dupont, X ;
Fletcher, D ;
Chauvin, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (01) :161-167
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF DEPTH OF GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - OBSERVATIONS ON PROCESSED EEG AND SPECTRAL EDGE FREQUENCY [J].
GURMAN, GM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1994, 11 (03) :185-189
[8]   The effects of plasma fentanyl concentrations on propofol requirement, emergence from anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia in propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia [J].
Han, T ;
Kim, D ;
Kil, H ;
Inagaki, Y .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (06) :1365-1371
[9]   COMPARISON OF SAME CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR 3-COMPARTMENT PK/PD MODELS [J].
HU, CP ;
LOVEJOY, WS ;
SHAFER, SL .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1994, 22 (06) :525-550
[10]   CONTEXT-SENSITIVE HALF-TIME IN MULTICOMPARTMENT PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS FOR INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC DRUGS [J].
HUGHES, MA ;
GLASS, PSA ;
JACOBS, JR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (03) :334-341