Sensitivity of various topographic data in flood management: Implications on inundation mapping over large data-scarce regions

被引:34
|
作者
Mohanty, Mohit Prakash [1 ]
Nithya, S. [2 ]
Nair, Akhilesh S. [3 ]
Indu, J. [3 ,4 ]
Ghosh, Subimal [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bhatt, Chandra Mohan [6 ]
Rao, Goru Srinivasa [7 ]
Karmakar, Subhankar [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Environm Sci & Engn Dept, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Informat Technol & Management Kerela, Kasshakoottam 695581, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Program Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[5] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[6] Ctr Space Sci & Technol Educ Asia & Pacific CSSTE, IIRS Campus, Dehra Dun 248001, Uttarakhand, India
[7] Indian Space Res Org ISRO, Natl Remote Sensing Ctr, Reg Remote Sensing Ctr East, Kolkata 700156, India
关键词
Digital elevation model; Flood inundation model; Flood risk assessment; Global DEMs; Resampling; Uncertainty; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DEM RESOLUTION; DAMAGE ASSESSMENT; GRID SIZE; SRTM DEM; IMPACT; LIDAR; ACCURACY; SCALE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125523
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Topographic data in the form of digital elevation models (DEMs) play a significant role in flood management. Despite the increasing availability of DEMs for large regions, there is a need to evaluate their performance at the inundation/flood level, while considering the overall complexity of flood models. The present study identifies, for the first time, the uncertainties generated in both river channel and overland flooding while considering a set of nine variants from various sources (LiDAR, Cartosat, SRTM, and ASTER) and grid resolutions (resampled versions) in the presence of discharge, rainfall, and tide boundary conditions for a severely flood-prone catchment in the Mahanadi River Basin, India. Extensive geostatistical analyses reveal the existence of significant biases with global DEMs i.e., SRTM and ASTER, whereas interestingly the LiDAR and Carto DEMs exhibit a high degree of isotropy. The global DEMs fail to capture several inundated spots; thus plummeting the flood inundation extents to a sufficient degree of unacceptability. Prominently, the inability in identifying high and very high flood depths (> 1.5 m) over the coastal stretches results in large uncertainties in the majority of the grids. Our analysis reveals the existence of significant noise in global DEMs, which nullifies the hydrodynamic interaction during the coupling of 1-D and 2-D flood models in presence of tidal influence. We recommend that under unavailability of precise LiDAR DEMs, resampled and freely available Carto DEMs, that are as efficient as LiDAR if not more, be given higher preference. We caution against the copious usage of global DEMs for large data-scarce and flood-prone regions, as the DEM uncertainty may be substantially amplified at the inundation level during combined channel and overland flood simulations. Through this study, we would like to recommend the proposed framework as a guided step while selecting appropriate DEM for flood inundation mapping over large data scarce regions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A novel conceptual flood inundation model for large scale data-scarce regions
    Unnithan, S. L. Kesav
    Biswal, Basudev
    Rudiger, Christoph
    Dubey, Amit Kumar
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2024, 171
  • [2] Utilizing Flood Inundation Observations to Obtain Floodplain Topography in Data-Scarce Regions
    Shastry, Apoorva
    Durand, Michael
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [3] Evaluation of Various Resolution DEMs in Flood Risk Assessment and Practical Rules for Flood Mapping in Data-Scarce Geospatial Areas: A Case Study in Thessaly, Greece
    Xafoulis, Nikolaos
    Kontos, Yiannis
    Farsirotou, Evangelia
    Kotsopoulos, Spyridon
    Perifanos, Konstantinos
    Alamanis, Nikolaos
    Dedousis, Dimitrios
    Katsifarakis, Konstantinos
    HYDROLOGY, 2023, 10 (04)
  • [4] Suitability of the height above nearest drainage (HAND) model for flood inundation mapping in data-scarce regions: a comparative analysis with hydrodynamic models
    Thalakkottukara, Navin Tony
    Thomas, Jobin
    Watkins, Melanie K.
    Holland, Benjamin C.
    Oommen, Thomas
    Grover, Himanshu
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2024, 17 (03) : 1907 - 1921
  • [5] Flood hazard mapping and assessment in data-scarce Nyaungdon area, Myanmar
    Khaing, Zaw Myo
    Zhang, Ke
    Sawano, Hisaya
    Shrestha, Badri Bhakra
    Sayama, Takahiro
    Nakamura, Kazuhiro
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [6] Improving the usability of global SRTM DEM for reach-scale floodplain inundation mapping in data-scarce regions through bias correction
    Jesna, Ismail
    Bhallamudi, S. Murty
    Sudheer, K. P.
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (03)
  • [7] Large Scale Flood Risk Mapping in Data Scarce Environments: An Application for Romania
    Albano, Raffaele
    Samela, Caterina
    Craciun, Iulia
    Manfreda, Salvatore
    Adamowski, Jan
    Sole, Aurelia
    Sivertun, Ake
    Ozunu, Alexandru
    WATER, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [8] Rapid flood inundation mapping using social media, remote sensing and topographic data
    Rosser, J. F.
    Leibovici, D. G.
    Jackson, M. J.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 87 (01) : 103 - 120
  • [9] Expert-based versus data-driven flood damage models: A comparative evaluation for data-scarce regions
    Malgwi, Mark Bawa
    Schlogl, Matthias
    Keiler, Margreth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 57
  • [10] Large-scale flood risk assessment in data-scarce areas: an application to Central Asia
    Ceresa, Paola
    Bussi, Gianbattista
    Denaro, Simona
    Coccia, Gabriele
    Bazzurro, Paolo
    Martina, Mario
    Faga, Ettore
    Avelar, Carlos
    Ordaz, Mario
    Huerta, Benjamin
    Garay, Osvaldo
    Raimbekova, Zhanar
    Abdrakhmatov, Kanatbek
    Mirzokhonova, Sitora
    Ismailov, Vakhitkhan
    Belikov, Vladimir
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2025, 25 (01) : 403 - 428