Feasibility of dominant intraprostatic lesion boosting using advanced photon-, proton- or brachytherapy

被引:23
作者
Andrzejewski, Piotr [1 ,3 ]
Kuess, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Knaeusl, Barbara [1 ,3 ]
Pinker, Katja [2 ,3 ]
Georg, Petra [3 ,4 ]
Knoth, Johannes [1 ]
Berger, Daniel [1 ]
Kirisits, Christian [1 ,3 ]
Goldner, Gregor [1 ,3 ]
Helbich, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Poetter, Richard [1 ,3 ]
Georg, Dietmar [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Christian Doppler Lab Med Radiat Res Radiat Oncol, Vienna, Austria
[4] EBG MedAustron GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
关键词
VMAT; IMPT; HDR-BT; DIL; Prostate cancer; SIB; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; ACUTE TOXICITY; NORMAL TISSUE; ESCALATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Advancements in imaging and dose delivery enable boosting of the dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL), while maintaining organs-at-risk (OAR) tolerances. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of DIL boosting for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Material and methods: DILs were defined on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fused with planning CT for twelve patients. VMAT, IMPT and HDR-BT plans were created for each patient with an EQD2(alpha/beta) DIL aimed at 111.6 Gy, PTVinitial D-pres was 80.9 Gy (EBRT) with CTV D-90% = 81.9 Gy (HDR-BT). Hard dose constraints were applied for OARs. Results: Higher boost doses were achieved with IMPT compared to VMAT, keeping major OAR doses at similar levels. Patient averaged EQD2 alpha/beta D505 to D-50% were 110.7, 114.2 and 150.1 Gy(IsoE) for VMAT, IMPT and HDR-BT, respectively. Respective rectal wall D-mean were 30.5 +/- 5.0, 16.7 +/- 3.6, 9.5 +/- 2.5 Gy(IsoE) and bladder wall Dmean were 21.0 +/- 5.5, 15.6 +/- 43 and 6.3 +/- 2.2 Gy(IsoE). Conclusions: DIL boosting was found to be feasible with all investigated techniques. Although OAR doses were higher than for standard treatment approach, the risk levels were reasonably low. HDR-BT was superior to VMAT and IMPT, both in terms of OAR sparing and DIL boosting. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 514
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Subgroup analysis of patients with localized prostate cancer treated within the Dutch-randomized dose escalation trial [J].
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim ;
Heemsbergen, Wilma D. ;
Levendag, Peter C. ;
Lebesque, Joos V. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (01) :13-18
[2]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[3]   Boosting imaging defined dominant prostatic tumors: A systematic review [J].
Bauman, Glenn ;
Haider, Masoom ;
Van der Heide, Uulke A. ;
Menard, Cynthia .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (03) :274-281
[4]   Fractionation and late rectal toxicity [J].
Brenner, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (04) :1013-1015
[5]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[6]   Analysis of intraprostatic failures in patients treated with hormonal therapy and radiotherapy: Implications for conformal therapy planning [J].
Cellini, N ;
Morganti, AG ;
Mattiucci, GC ;
Valentini, V ;
Leone, M ;
Luzi, S ;
Manfredi, R ;
Dinapoli, N ;
Digesu', C ;
Smaniotto, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (03) :595-599
[7]   The effect of anterior proton beams in the setting of a prostate-rectum spacer [J].
Christodouleas, John P. ;
Tang, Shikui ;
Susil, Robert C. ;
McNutt, Todd R. ;
Song, Danny Y. ;
Bekelman, Justin ;
Deville, Curtiland ;
Vapiwala, Neha ;
DeWeese, Theodore L. ;
Lu, Hsiao-Ming ;
Both, Stefan .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) :315-319
[8]   The magnetic resonance detected intraprostatic lesion in prostate cancer: planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy [J].
De Meerleer, G ;
Villeirs, G ;
Bral, S ;
Paelinck, L ;
De Gersem, W ;
Dekuyper, P ;
De Neve, W .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 (03) :325-333
[9]   Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[10]   CERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research [J].
Deasy, JO ;
Blanco, AI ;
Clark, VH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (05) :979-985