Classifying for Social Diversity

被引:14
作者
Szostak, Rick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4, Canada
来源
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION | 2014年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
classification; concepts; approach; groups; perspective; relationships; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.5771/0943-7444-2014-2-160
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This paper argues that a new approach to classification best supports and respects social diversity. We should want a classification that facilitates communication both within groups and across groups. We should also want no group to be privileged within the classification. These goals are best accomplished through a truly universal classification, grounded in basic concepts, that classifies works in terms of authorial perspective. Strategies for classifying perspective are discussed. The paper then addresses issues of classification structure. It follows a feminist approach to classification, and shows how a web-of-relations approach can be instantiated in a classification. Finally the paper turns to classificatory process. The key argument here is that much (perhaps all) of the concern regarding the possibility that classes can be subdivided into subclasses in multiple ways, each favored by different groups or individuals, simply vanishes within a web-of-relations approach. The reason is that most of these supposed ways of subdividing classes are in fact ways of subdividing different relationships among classes.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 170
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Borner K., 2006, Visualizing the semantic web: XML-based internet and information visualization, P183
[2]   Including Authorial Stance in the Indexing of Scientific Documents [J].
Clavier, Viviane ;
Paganelli, Celine .
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 2012, 39 (04) :292-299
[3]  
Cooper R, 2011, KNOWL ORGAN, V38, P398
[4]  
Fann K.T., 1970, PEIRCES THEORY ABDUC
[5]   How information systems communicate as documents: the concept of authorial voice [J].
Feinberg, Melanie .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2011, 67 (06) :1015-1037
[6]   Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization [J].
Friedman, Alon ;
Smiraglia, Richard P. .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2013, 69 (01) :27-48
[7]   Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization [J].
Gnoli, Claudio .
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 2008, 35 (2-3) :137-149
[8]   Metadata About What? Distinguishing Between Ontic, Epistemic, and Documental Dimensions in Knowledge Organization [J].
Gnoli, Claudio .
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 2012, 39 (04) :268-275
[9]   Is classification necessary after Google? [J].
Hjorland, Birger .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2012, 68 (03) :299-317
[10]   Reducing Subject Tree Browsing Complexity [J].
Julien, Charles-Antoine ;
Tirilly, Pierre ;
Dinneen, Jesse David ;
Guastavino, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (11) :2201-2223