Machine Learning Based Classification and Modelling of Underwater Acoustic Communication

被引:3
作者
Ganesh, Sai C. S. [1 ]
Jyothi, V. B. N. [2 ]
Barathwaj, Aoutithiye S. R. Y. [1 ]
Azhagumurugan, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sai Ram Engn Coll, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Natl Inst Ocean Technol, Div Deep Sea Technol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
OCEANS 2022 | 2022年
关键词
Acoustic Communication; Ocean Acoustics; Acoustic Propagation Models; Machine Learning; Ensemble Learning; PROPAGATION MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/OCEANSChennai45887.2022.9775503
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The acoustic medium in ocean has high complications due to its non-homogenous property. The speed of sound in the medium plays a significant role in acoustic computations and is more related to the density and compressibility of the propagation medium. Several acoustic propagation modelling methods that are described by wave equations are proposed for different underwater applications. The mathematical propagation models that are used widely are the el), normal mode method (Kraken), wavenumber integration (Scooter), and parabolic equations (RAMGeo). The propagation models compute several parameters that include transmission loss, impulse response, arrival time, etc. with the input of the sound velocity profile and the transmission environment. The error rate of the propagation models varies with respect to the frequency, range of transmission and other parameters as well. In this paper, a classification dataset for shallow water propagation is generated with the threshold limits of range and frequency of each propagation model. Since, the limits of the propagation model are non-linear, machine learning based algorithms are proposed and validated with the data generated. Finally, an GUI is created that classifies the required propagation model and simulate the model with the inputs of range, frequency and sound velocity profiles.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J ACOUST SOC AM, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.4755149
[2]  
[Anonymous], Ocean acoustics library
[3]   COMPARISON OF 3 PROPAGATION MODELS WITH DETAILED CONVERGENCE ZONE TRANSMISSION LOSS DATA [J].
BOYLES, CA ;
JOICE, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 64 :S74-S74
[4]   A NORMAL MODE THEORY OF AN UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC DUCT BY MEANS OF GREENS FUNCTION [J].
DEAVENPORT, RL .
RADIO SCIENCE, 1966, 1 (06) :709-+
[5]   Ensemble Method of Effective AdaBoost Algorithm for Decision Tree Classifiers [J].
Dinakaran, S. ;
Thangaiah, P. Ranjit Jeba .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2017, 26 (03)
[6]  
Duncan A.J., 2006, 1 AUSTR AC SOC C NOV, P471
[7]   Advanced Applications for Underwater Acoustic Modeling [J].
Etter, Paul C. .
ADVANCES IN ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION, 2012, 2012
[8]  
Gul S, 2017, INT BHURBAN C APPL S, P665, DOI 10.1109/IBCAST.2017.7868122
[9]  
Jensen FB, 2011, MOD ACOUST SIGN PROC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8678-8
[10]   Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: How Do Acoustic Propagation Models Impact the Performance of Higher-Level Protocols? [J].
Llor, Jesus ;
Malumbres, Manuel P. .
SENSORS, 2012, 12 (02) :1312-1335