Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of short forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in participants with musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional study

被引:24
作者
Nishigami, Tomohiko [1 ]
Mibu, Akira [2 ]
Tanaka, Katsuyoshi [2 ]
Yamashita, Yuh [3 ]
Watanabe, Akihisa [4 ]
Tanabe, Akihito [2 ]
机构
[1] Konan Womans Univ, Dept Nursing & Phys Therapy, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Tanabe Orthopaed, Dept Rehabil, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
[3] Morinaga Orthoped Clin, Dept Rehabil, Saga, Saga, Japan
[4] Machida Orthopaed, Dept Rehabil, Ino, Kochi, Japan
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; GENERIC CORE SCALES; CULTURAL ADAPTATION; SCHOOL-CHILDREN; PERSISTENT PAIN; KOREAN VERSION; VALIDATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2016.11.015
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a commonly used as measure of pain catastrophizing. The scale comprises 13 items related to magnification, rumination, and helplessness. To facilitate quick screening and to reduce participant's burden, the four-item and six-item short forms of the English version of the PCS were developed. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Japanese version of the short forms of PCS using a contemporary approach called Rasch analysis. Methods: A total of 216 patients with musculoskeletal disorders were recruited in this study. Participants completed study measures, which included the pain intensity, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Furthermore, the four-item (items 3, 6, 8, and 11) and six-item (items 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, and 13) short forms of the Japanese version of PCS were measured. We used Rasch analysis to analyze the psychometric properties of the original, four-item, and six-item short forms of PCS. Results: Rasch analysis showed that both short forms of PCS had acceptable internal consistency, unidimensionality, and no notable DIF and were functional on the category rating scale. However, fouritem short form of PCS had two misfit items. Conclusions: Six-item short form of PCS has acceptable psychometric properties and is suitable for use in participants with musculoskeletal pain. Thus, six-item can be used as brief instruments to evaluate pain catastrophizing. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 356
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Rasch G, 1960, PROBABILISTIC MODELS
[22]   Pain catastrophizing and general health status in a large Dutch community sample [J].
Severeijns, R ;
van den Hout, MA ;
Vlaeyen, JWS ;
Picavetc, HSJ .
PAIN, 2002, 99 (1-2) :367-376
[23]   Reduction of pain catastrophizing mediates the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain [J].
Smeets, RJEM ;
Vlaeyen, JWS ;
Kester, ADM ;
André-Knottnerus, J .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 7 (04) :261-271
[24]   Catastrophizing and internal pain control as mediators of outcome in the multidisciplinary treatment of chronic low back pain [J].
Spinhoven, P ;
ter Kuile, M ;
Kole-Snijders, AMJ ;
Mansfeld, MH ;
den Ouden, DJ ;
Vlaeyen, JWS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 8 (03) :211-219
[25]   Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain [J].
Sullivan, MJL ;
Thorn, B ;
Haythornthwaite, JA ;
Keefe, F ;
Martin, M ;
Bradley, LA ;
Lefebvre, JC .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2001, 17 (01) :52-64
[26]   The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation [J].
Sullivan, MJL ;
Bishop, SR ;
Pivik, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (04) :524-532
[27]   The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? [J].
Tennant, Alan ;
Conaghan, Philip G. .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2007, 57 (08) :1358-1362
[28]   FEAR OF MOVEMENT (RE)INJURY IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN AND ITS RELATION TO BEHAVIORAL PERFORMANCE [J].
VLAEYEN, JWS ;
KOLESNIJDERS, AMJ ;
BOEREN, RGB ;
VANEEK, H .
PAIN, 1995, 62 (03) :363-372
[29]  
Wright BD, 1975, 19 MESA U CHIC DEP E, V19
[30]  
Wright BD, 1976, 21 U CHIC DEP ED STA, V21