Interaction of Brassicaceae SeedMeal Soil Amendment and Apple Rootstock Genotype on Microbiome Structure and Replant Disease Suppression

被引:19
|
作者
Wang, Likun [1 ]
Mazzola, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Tree Fruit Res Lab, 1104 N Western Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
PRATYLENCHUS-PENETRANS; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; MEAL AMENDMENT; TREE GROWTH; RHIZOSPHERE; FUMIGATION; RESISTANCE; VOLATILES; SEEDLINGS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0230-R
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Preplant soil application of a Brassica juncea-Sinapis alba seed meal formulation (SM) at a rate of 6.6 t ha(-1) alters composition of the orchard soil microbiome in a manner that yields sustainable long-term suppression of soilborne pathogens in apple production systems. However, the cost of SM amendment has hindered the adoption of this tactic to manage apple replant disease in commercial orchards. Greenhouse trials were conducted to assess the effect of reduced SM application rates in concert with apple rootstock genotype on structure of the rhizosphere microbiome and associated disease control outcomes. At all application rates assessed, SM treatment increased tree growth and reduced disease development relative to the control. In general, total tree biomass and leader shoot length were similar in soils treated with SM at 4.4 or 6.6 t ha(-1) regardless of rootstock genotype. Equivalent increase in tree biomass when cultivated in soil treated at the lowest and highest SM amendment rate was attained when used in conjunction with G.41 or G.210 apple rootstocks. Suppression of Pythium spp. or Pratylenchus penetrans root densities was similar at all SM application rates. When cultivated in nontreated replant orchard soil, Geneva rootstocks (G.41 and G.210) exhibited lower levels of Pythium spp. and P. penetrans root colonization relative to Malling rootstocks (M.9 and MM.106). For a given rootstock, structure of the rhizosphere microbiome was similar in soils treated with SM at 4.4 and 6.6 t ha(-1). G.41 and G.210 rootstocks but not M.9 or MM.106 cultivated in soil treated with SM at 2.2 t ha(-1) possessed a rhizosphere bacterial community structure that differed significantly from the control. Findings indicate that effective control of apple replant disease may be attained at lower SM amendment rates than employed previously, with lower effective rates possible when integrated with tolerant rootstock genotypes such as G.41 or G.210.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 614
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Field Evaluation of Reduced Rate Brassicaceae Seed Meal Amendment and Rootstock Genotype on the Microbiome and Control of Apple Replant Disease
    Wang, Likun
    Mazzola, Mark
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 109 (08) : 1378 - 1391
  • [2] Apple replant disease and the -omics: Interaction of apple rootstock metabolome and the soil microbiome
    Leisso, R.
    Leisso, R.
    Mazzola, M.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 106 (12) : 160 - 160
  • [3] The Effect of Rotating Apple Rootstock Genotypes on Apple Replant Disease and Rhizosphere Microbiome
    Deakin, Greg
    Fernandez-Fernandez, Felicidad
    Bennett, Julie
    Passey, Tom
    Harrison, Nicola
    Tilston, Emma L.
    Xu, Xiangming
    PHYTOBIOMES JOURNAL, 2019, 3 (04): : 273 - 285
  • [4] Influence of rootstock genotype on efficacy of anaerobic soil disinfestation for control of apple nursery replant disease
    Shashika S. Hewavitharana
    Mark Mazzola
    European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2020, 157 : 39 - 57
  • [5] Influence of rootstock genotype on efficacy of anaerobic soil disinfestation for control of apple nursery replant disease
    Hewavitharana, Shashika S.
    Mazzola, Mark
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2020, 157 (01) : 39 - 57
  • [6] Rootstock genotype and orchard replant position rather than soil fumigation or compost amendment determine tree growth and rhizosphere bacterial community composition in an apple replant soil
    Rumberger, A
    Yao, SR
    Merwin, IA
    Nelson, EB
    Thies, JE
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2004, 264 (1-2) : 247 - 260
  • [7] Rootstock genotype and orchard replant position rather than soil fumigation or compost amendment determine tree growth and rhizosphere bacterial community composition in an apple replant soil
    Angelika Rumberger
    Shengrui Yao
    Ian A. Merwin
    Eric B. Nelson
    Janice E. Thies
    Plant and Soil, 2004, 264 : 247 - 260
  • [8] Comparative Analysis of the Apple Root Transcriptome as Affected by Rootstock Genotype and Brassicaceae Seed Meal Soil Amendment: Implications for Plant Health
    Wang, Likun
    Somera, Tracey S.
    Hargarten, Heidi
    Honaas, Loren
    Mazzola, Mark
    MICROORGANISMS, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [9] Rootstock Genotype Interactions with Rhizosphere Microbial Consortia, and Associated Responses to Apple Replant Disease
    Merwin, Ian
    Laurant, Angelika St.
    Yao, Shengru
    Leinfelder, Michelle
    Thies, Janice
    HORTSCIENCE, 2010, 45 (08) : S34 - S35
  • [10] Rootstock genotype succession influences apple replant disease and root-zone microbial community composition in an orchard soil
    Angelika St. Laurent
    Ian A. Merwin
    Gennaro Fazio
    Janice E. Thies
    Michael G. Brown
    Plant and Soil, 2010, 337 : 259 - 272