The Reminding Effect: Presentation of Associates Enhances Memory for Related Words in a List

被引:29
作者
Tullis, Jonathan G. [1 ]
Benjamin, Aaron S. [2 ]
Ross, Brian H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN 47401 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
reminding; study-phase retrieval; spacing effect; lag effect; STUDY-PHASE RETRIEVAL; FREE-RECALL; RECURSIVE REMINDINGS; ANALOGICAL TRANSFER; RECOGNITION MEMORY; TEMPORAL CONTEXT; REPETITION; JUDGMENTS; RECENCY; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0036036
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One aspect of successful cognition is the efficient use of prior relevant knowledge in novel situations. Remindings-stimulus-guided retrievals of prior events-allow us to link prior knowledge to current problems by prompting us to retrieve relevant knowledge from events that are distant from the present. Theorizing in research on higher cognition makes much use of the concept of remindings, yet many basic mnemonic consequences of remindings are untested. Here we consider implications of reminding-based theories of the effects of repetition on memory (Benjamin & Tullis, 2010; Hintzman, 2011). Those theories suggest that the spacing of repeated presentations of material benefits memory when the later experience reminds the learner of the earlier one. When applied to memory for related, rather than repeated, material, these theories predict a reminding effect: a mnemonic boost caused by a nearby presentation of a related item. In 7 experiments, we assessed this prediction by having learners study lists of words that contained related word pairs. Recall performance for the first presentation in related pairs was higher than for equivalent items in unrelated pairs, while recognition performance for items in related pairs did not differ from those in unrelated pairs. Remindings benefit only the recollection of the retrieved episodes.
引用
收藏
页码:1526 / 1540
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[2]   Examining the spacing effect in advertising: Encoding variability, retrieval processes, and their interaction [J].
Appleton-Knapp, SL ;
Bjork, RA ;
Wickens, TD .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (02) :266-276
[3]   The list-strength effect: Strength-dependent competition or suppression? [J].
Bauml, KH .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (02) :260-264
[4]  
Benjamin A.S., 2010, Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork, P71
[5]  
Benjamin A.S., 2008, HDB METAMEMORY MEMOR, P73, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203805503.CH5
[6]   What makes distributed practice effective? [J].
Benjamin, Aaron S. ;
Tullis, Jonathan .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 61 (03) :228-247
[7]   The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bjork, RA ;
Schwartz, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :55-68
[8]   Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory [J].
Benjamin, AS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2003, 31 (02) :297-305
[9]  
Braun K, 1998, MEMORY, V6, P37
[10]   The testing effect in recognition memory: A dual process account [J].
Chan, Jason C. K. ;
McDermott, Kathleen B. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (02) :431-437