Verification of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Method AMETA for Aircraft Fatigue Life Management

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Tzikang John [1 ]
Shiao, Michael [1 ]
Haile, Mulugeta [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Res Lab, Vehicle Technol Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
来源
NONDESTRUCTIVE CHARACTERIZATION AND MONITORING OF ADVANCED MATERIALS, AEROSPACE, CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, AND TRANSPORTATION XIII | 2019年 / 10971卷
关键词
Aircraft Maintenance Event Tree Analysis; AMETA; Fatigue Life Management; Monte Carlo; Importance Sampling; probability of detection; inspection scheduling; repair/replacement/retirement strategies;
D O I
10.1117/12.2513592
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A probabilistic risk assessment method to assess the failure possibilities of aircraft fatigue critical components due to fatigue damage initiation and propagation, as well as the effect of complex maintenance scenarios throughout the aircraft's service life (including multiple repair types and various nondestructive inspection (NDI) techniques), needs to be developed for aircraft fatigue life management. The traditional Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) offers the most robust and reliable solution; however, MCS is time consuming and unable to support prompt risk decisions. To relieve the computational burden, a novel probabilistic method-AMETA (Aircraft Maintenance Event Tree Analysis)-was developed, which combines the generality of random simulations with the efficiency of analytical probabilistic methods. AMETA consists of a fatigue maintenance event tree and a probabilistic algorithm comprising a set of probabilistic equations. AMETA systematically transforms a complex random maintenance pattern requiring a large number (in the order of billions) of MCSs to more logical and manageable fatigue paths represented by a finite set of probabilistic events to achieve the required computational accuracy and efficiency. Furthermore, the Importance Sampling Method (ISM) can be used for efficiency improvement. In this paper, the accuracy, efficiency and robustness of AMETA are verified and demonstrated. A procedure was provided to select the most suitable sampling functions for ISM. It is found that AMETA is several orders of magnitude more efficient than MCS for the same level of accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Verification of Recursive Probabilistic Integration (RPI) Method for Fatigue Life Management using Non-Destructive Inspections
    Chen, Tzikang John
    Shiao, Michael
    HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2016, 2016, 9805
  • [2] Probabilistic structural risk assessment for fatigue management using structural health monitoring
    Shiao, Michael
    Wu, Y-T.
    Ghoshal, Anindya
    Ayers, James
    Le, Dy
    NONDESTRUCTIVE CHARACTERIZATION FOR COMPOSITE MATERIALS, AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, AND HOMELAND SECURITY 2012, 2012, 8347
  • [3] A risk assessment method of aircraft structure damage maintenance interval considering fatigue crack growth and detection rate
    Zhang, Zhuzhu
    Mao, Haitao
    Liu, Yulin
    Jiao, Peng
    Hu, Wenlin
    Shen, Pei
    EKSPLOATACJA I NIEZAWODNOSC-MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY, 2023, 25 (01):
  • [4] A model assessment method for predicting structural fatigue life using Lamb waves
    Wang, Dengjiang
    He, Jingjing
    Guan, Xuefei
    Yang, Jinsong
    Zhang, Weifang
    ULTRASONICS, 2018, 84 : 319 - 328
  • [5] Inspection interval optimization of aircraft landing gear component based on risk assessment using equivalent initial flaw size distribution method
    Lee, Youngjun
    Park, Jongwoon
    Lee, Dooyoul
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 21 (04): : 1396 - 1406