Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

被引:167
作者
Carrick, Sue [1 ]
Parker, Sharon [2 ]
Thornton, Charlene E. [2 ]
Ghersi, Davina [2 ]
Simes, John [2 ]
Wilcken, Nicholas [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Breast Canc Fdn, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[3] Westmead & Nepean Hosp, Westmead, NSW, Australia
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 02期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
PHASE-III TRIAL; MULTIPLE DRUG-THERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MITOMYCIN-C; PLUS VINORELBINE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; LINE THERAPY; DOXORUBICIN; ADRIAMYCIN;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Combination chemotherapy regimens are frequently favoured over single agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, in an attempt to achieve superior tumour response rates. It is not known however whether giving more intensive chemotherapy regimens results in better health outcomes, when both survival and toxicity are considered, and whether better response rates and rates of progression free survival actually translate to better overall survival. Objectives To compare single agent with combination chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register November 2008. Handsearching of recent conference proceedings was also undertaken. Selection criteria Randomised trials of single agent chemotherapy compared to combination therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Hazard ratios were derived for reported time-to-event outcomes. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where present. Main results Forty three eligible trials (48 comparisons) were identified. These included 9742 women, 55% of whom were receiving first-line treatment for metastatic disease. For overall survival there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the combination regimens with no heterogeneity (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93, p < 0.00001). Results were very similar when trials of first-line treatment were analysed, and for analyses where the single agent was also included in the combination regimen. Combination regimens showed a statistically significant advantage for survival over single agent taxane (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75-0.89, p < 0.00001), but not anthracycline (HR 0.94.86-1.02, p=0.15). Combination regimens were also associated with significantly better time to progression (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.82, p < 0.00001) and response (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.45, p < 0.0001) although heterogeneity was statistically significant in both instances and probably due to clinical diversity of the participants and interventions. Women receiving combination regimens experienced a statistically significant detrimental effect on white cell count, increased alopecia and nausea and vomiting. Authors' conclusions Combination chemotherapy regimens show a statistically significant advantage for survival, tumor response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer but they also produce more toxicity. An unresolved question is whether combination regimens are more effective than single agents given sequentially.
引用
收藏
页数:196
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [51] Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer
    Keller, AM
    Mennel, R
    Georgoulias, VA
    Nabholtz, JM
    Erazo, A
    Lluch, A
    Vogel, CL
    Kaufmann, M
    von Minckwitz, G
    Henderson, IC
    Mellars, L
    Alland, L
    Tendler, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (19) : 3893 - 3901
  • [52] KELLER AM, 2001, AM SOC CLIN ONCOLOGY
  • [53] LEGHA SS, 1979, CANCER TREAT REP, V63, P2053
  • [54] LIU TJ, 1986, J FORMOS MED ASSOC, V85, P376
  • [55] MANN GB, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V56, P1320, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850915)56:6<1320::AID-CNCR2820560617>3.0.CO
  • [56] 2-R
  • [57] Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes:: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial
    Martin, Miguel
    Ruiz, Amparo
    Munoz, Monserrat
    Balil, Ana
    Garcia-Mata, Jesus
    Calvo, Lourdes
    Carrasco, Eva
    Mahillo, Esther
    Casado, Antonio
    Angel Garcia-Saenz, Jose
    Jose Escudero, M.
    Guillem, Vicente
    Jara, Carlos
    Ribelles, Nuria
    Salas, Fernando
    Soto, Celia
    Morales-Vasquez, Flavia
    Rodriguez, Cesar A.
    Adrover, Encarna
    Ramon Mel, Jose
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [58] MILES D, 2004, CLIN BREAST CANCER, P273
  • [59] MOINPOUR C, 2004, GEMCITABINE PLUS P S, V22
  • [60] MOURIDSEN HT, 1977, CANCER TREAT REP, V61, P47