Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

被引:167
作者
Carrick, Sue [1 ]
Parker, Sharon [2 ]
Thornton, Charlene E. [2 ]
Ghersi, Davina [2 ]
Simes, John [2 ]
Wilcken, Nicholas [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Breast Canc Fdn, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[3] Westmead & Nepean Hosp, Westmead, NSW, Australia
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 02期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
PHASE-III TRIAL; MULTIPLE DRUG-THERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MITOMYCIN-C; PLUS VINORELBINE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; LINE THERAPY; DOXORUBICIN; ADRIAMYCIN;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Combination chemotherapy regimens are frequently favoured over single agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, in an attempt to achieve superior tumour response rates. It is not known however whether giving more intensive chemotherapy regimens results in better health outcomes, when both survival and toxicity are considered, and whether better response rates and rates of progression free survival actually translate to better overall survival. Objectives To compare single agent with combination chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register November 2008. Handsearching of recent conference proceedings was also undertaken. Selection criteria Randomised trials of single agent chemotherapy compared to combination therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Hazard ratios were derived for reported time-to-event outcomes. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where present. Main results Forty three eligible trials (48 comparisons) were identified. These included 9742 women, 55% of whom were receiving first-line treatment for metastatic disease. For overall survival there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the combination regimens with no heterogeneity (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93, p < 0.00001). Results were very similar when trials of first-line treatment were analysed, and for analyses where the single agent was also included in the combination regimen. Combination regimens showed a statistically significant advantage for survival over single agent taxane (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75-0.89, p < 0.00001), but not anthracycline (HR 0.94.86-1.02, p=0.15). Combination regimens were also associated with significantly better time to progression (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.82, p < 0.00001) and response (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.45, p < 0.0001) although heterogeneity was statistically significant in both instances and probably due to clinical diversity of the participants and interventions. Women receiving combination regimens experienced a statistically significant detrimental effect on white cell count, increased alopecia and nausea and vomiting. Authors' conclusions Combination chemotherapy regimens show a statistically significant advantage for survival, tumor response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer but they also produce more toxicity. An unresolved question is whether combination regimens are more effective than single agents given sequentially.
引用
收藏
页数:196
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [11] BONNETERRE J, 1991, J CLIN ONCOL, V9, P305
  • [12] *BREAST CANC CTR, REC US TRAST HERC TR
  • [13] BURZYNSKI, 1999, TRIAL REGISTER
  • [14] BUTLER FO, 2004, STUDY DOCETAXEL MONO
  • [15] CANELLOS GP, 1976, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V38, P1882, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197611)38:5<1882::AID-CNCR2820380503>3.0.CO
  • [16] 2-H
  • [17] Second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: what did we learn in the last two decades?
    Cardoso, F
    Di Leo, A
    Lohrisch, C
    Bernard, C
    Ferreira, F
    Piccart, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (02) : 197 - 207
  • [18] SINGLE-DRUG VS COMBINATION CYTO-TOXIC CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    CARMOPEREIRA, J
    OLIVEIRACOSTA, F
    HENRIQUES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1980, 16 (12) : 1621 - 1625
  • [19] Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer - art. no. CD003372.pub2
    Carrick, S
    Parker, S
    Wilcken, N
    Ghersi, D
    Marzo, M
    Simes, J
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (02):
  • [20] Achievements in systemic therapies in the pregenomic era in metastatic breast cancer
    Colozza, Mariantonietta
    de Azambuja, Evandro
    Personeni, Nicola
    Lebrun, Fabienne
    Piccart, Martine J.
    Cardoso, Fatima
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (03) : 253 - 270