Analyzing the green efficiency of arable land use in China

被引:115
作者
Xie, Hualin [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Qianru [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
He, Yafen [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Ecol Civilizat, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Coinnovat Ctr Inst Construct Jiangxi Ecocivilizat, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green efficiency; Green production technology; Technology innovators; Arable land use; Non-radial directional distance function (NDDF); Luenberger productivity index; China; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; DEA; PERFORMANCE; VARIABLES; ENERGY; ZONES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, a non-radial directional distance function (NDDF) approach is used to evaluate and analyze the green efficiency of arable land use of China's 30 provinces and cities during the period 1995-2013. The study finds that the green efficiency of arable land use in China shows a trend that is first declining and then increasing. Northeast China is the most efficient, followed by the southwestern region, the eastern region, and the northwestern region; the central region has the lowest efficiency. At the provincial level, the green efficiency of arable land use in Guangdong is the highest, followed by Guangxi and Jilin. The green efficiency of arable land use in Heilongjiang, Beijing, and Tibet is relatively low. All the environmentally green production technology leaders come from the northeastern, northwestern, and southwestern regions. The results of an analysis of dynamic efficiency change show that the technology change for arable land use was significantly higher than the efficiency change. This reflects that the country's attempts to improve production technology as well as its policies for the improvement of environmental conditions had played a significant role. Even though these practices are at the expense of short-term efficiency, they are conducive to long-term technological progress.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COST REVENUE CONSTRA
[2]  
BALL E, 1994, CAHIERS EC SOCIOLOGI, V31, P60
[3]  
Boussemart J.P., 2003, Bulletin of Economic Research, Bulletin of Economic Research, V55, P391, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8586.00183
[4]   Benefit and distance functions [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 70 (02) :407-419
[5]   Estimating policy pressure for China's cultivated land use protection based on an extended index [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Cheng, Shulei ;
Song, Malin .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2017, 101 :21-34
[6]  
Chen MinPeng Chen MinPeng, 2006, China Environmental Science, V26, P751
[7]  
Chen NengChang Chen NengChang, 2017, Journal of Agro-Environment Science, V36, P1689
[8]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[9]  
Dang X., 2010, J XIAN JIAOTONG U SO, V30
[10]  
Fare R, 2005, STUD PRODUCT EFFIC, V3, P1, DOI 10.1007/0-387-27594-0