Shear Capacity of a RC Bridge Deck Slab: Comparison between Multilevel Assessment and Field Test

被引:13
作者
Shu, Jiangpeng [1 ]
Bagge, Niklas [2 ,3 ]
Plos, Mario [1 ]
Johansson, Morgan [1 ,4 ]
Yang, Yuguang [5 ]
Zandi, Kamyab [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[3] WSP Sverige AB, Dept Bridge & Hydraul Engn, S-97231 Lulea, Sweden
[4] Norconsult AB, Theres Svenssons Gata 11, S-41755 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Struct Engn, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Shear and punching; Multilevel assessment strategy; Bridge deck slab; Finite-element (FE) analysis; Full-scale test; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; REINFORCED-CONCRETE SLABS; PUNCHING SHEAR; TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT; STRENGTH; FAILURE; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002076
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
For reinforced concrete (RC) slabs without shear reinforcement, shear and punching can be the governing failure mode at the ultimate limit state if subjected to large concentrated loads. Shear and punching of RC slabs without shear reinforcement has been a challenging problem in assessment based on current standards. To examine a previously developed enhanced analysis approach, this study was conducted by applying a multilevel assessment strategy to a 55-year old RC bridge deck slab subjected to concentrated loads near the main girder in a field failure test. This strategy clearly provides the engineering community a framework for using successively improved structural analysis methods for enhanced assessment in a straightforward manner. The differences between analysis methods at different levels of assessment were discussed regarding one-way shear and punching shear behavior of the slab. The influences of parameters, such as boundary conditions, location of concentrated loads, and shear force distribution, were investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Shear Capacity of an Existing RC Bridge Deck Slab: FE Analysis Using Continuum Elements
    Shu, Jiangpeng
    MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, RISK, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGES, 2018, : 2061 - 2068
  • [2] Shear assessment of a reinforced concrete bridge deck slab according to level-of-approximation approach
    Shu, Jiangpeng
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2018, 19 (06) : 1838 - 1850
  • [3] Damage assessment of concrete bridge deck slab by field monitoring data
    Li, Jiren
    Song, Bo
    Wu, Lin
    Zhou, Hongyu
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURE, MATERIALS AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 230 - +
  • [4] Assessment of a cantilever bridge deck slab using multi-level assessment strategy and decision support framework
    Shu, Jiangpeng
    Honfi, Daniel
    Plos, Mario
    Zandi, Kamyab
    Magnusson, Jonas
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 200
  • [5] Extended CSDT model for shear capacity assessments of bridge deck slabs
    de Sousa, Alex M. D.
    Lantsoght, Eva O. L.
    Yang, Yuguang
    El Debs, Mounir K.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 234
  • [6] Punching shear capacity of RC slab-CFT column connections
    Chen, Cheng-Cheng
    Giduquio, Marnie B.
    Chang, Shih-Chieh Liu
    Cheng, Min-Yuan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 218 (218)
  • [7] Assessment of Effective and Minimal Slab Widths for Evaluating the Shear Capacity of RC Overhang Slabs
    Javier Veganzones Munoz, Jose
    Pacoste, Costin
    Karoumi, Raid
    NORDIC CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2023, 68 (01): : 64 - 85
  • [8] Field Destructive Testing of a Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck Slab
    Shu, Jiangpeng
    Bagge, Niklas
    Nilimaa, Jonny
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2020, 25 (09)
  • [9] Punching Capacity of a Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck Slab Loaded to Failure
    Bagge, Niklas
    Shu, Jiangpeng
    Plos, Mario
    Elfgren, Lennart
    NORDIC CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (02): : 57 - 60
  • [10] A stress field approach for the shear capacity of RC beams with stirrups
    De Domenico, Dario
    Ricciardi, Giuseppe
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2020, 73 (05) : 515 - 527