Assessment of adherence and relative dose intensity with oral chemotherapy in oncology clinical trials at an academic medical center

被引:6
|
作者
Engle, Jeff A. [1 ]
Traynor, Anne M. [2 ]
Campbell, Toby C. [2 ,3 ]
Wisinski, Kari B. [2 ]
LoConte, Noelle [2 ]
Liu, Glenn [2 ]
Wilding, George [4 ]
Kolesar, Jill M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Carbone Canc Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Coll Pharm, 567 TODD,789 S Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
Oral chemotherapy; adherence; relative dose intensity; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ANTICANCER AGENTS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCE; THERAPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1177/1078155217704989
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aims Oral chemotherapy is increasingly utilized leaving the patient responsible for self-administering an often complex regimen where adverse effects are common. Non-adherence and reduced relative dose intensity are both associated with poorer outcomes in the community setting but are rarely reported in clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to quantify adherence and relative dose intensity in oncology clinical trials and to determine patient and study related factors that influence adherence and relative dose intensity. Methods Patients were identified from non-industry-funded clinical trials conducted between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2013 at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center. Data were extracted from primary research records. Descriptive statistics and linear regression modeling was performed using SAS 9.4. Results A total of 17 clinical trials and 266 subjects were included. Mean adherence was greater than 97% for the first eight cycles. Mean relative dose intensity was less than 90% for the first cycle and declined over time. Male gender, a performance status of 1 or 2, metastatic disease, and traveling more than 90 miles to reach the cancer center were associated with higher relative dose intensity. Conclusions Patients with cancer enrolled in clinical trials are highly adherent but unlikely to achieve protocol specified relative dose intensity. Given that determining the phase II dose is the primary endpoint of phase I trials, incorporating relative dose intensity into this determination should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 353
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a Pharmacist Led Oral Chemotherapy Clinic: A Pilot Program in the Gastrointestinal Oncology Clinic at an Academic Medical Center
    Darling, Julianne O.
    Raheem, Farah
    Carter, Katelyn C.
    Ledbetter, Elizabeth
    Lowe, Jennifer F.
    Lowe, Christopher
    PHARMACY, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [2] Diversity of Participants in Clinical Trials in an Academic Medical Center The Role of the 'Good Study Patient?'
    Joseph, Galen
    Dohan, Daniel
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (03) : 608 - 615
  • [3] Dose Delays, Dose Reductions, and Relative Dose Intensity in Patients With Cancer Who Received Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Community Oncology Practices
    Denduluri, Neelima
    Patt, Debra A.
    Wang, Yunfei
    Bhor, Menaka
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Favret, Anne M.
    Morrow, Phuong Khanh
    Barron, Richard L.
    Asmar, Lina
    Saravanan, Shanmugapriya
    Li, Yanli
    Garcia, Jacob
    Lyman, Gary H.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (11): : 1383 - +
  • [4] Clinical Outcomes of Acid Suppressive Therapy Use in Hematology/Oncology Patients at an Academic Medical Center
    McCaleb, Rachael V.
    Gandhi, Arpita S.
    Clark, Stephen Michael
    Clemmons, Amber B.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 50 (07) : 541 - 547
  • [5] Inclusion of black Americans in oncology clinical trials - The Louisiana State University Medical Center experience
    Holcombe, RF
    Jacobson, J
    Li, AL
    Moinpour, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 22 (01): : 18 - 21
  • [6] Preparing clinicians to be site investigators in multicenter clinical trials: A training program at an academic medical center
    Loucks, Tammy L.
    Lee-Chavarria, Diana
    Harvey, Jillian
    Paranal, Rechelle
    Denmark, Signe
    Flume, Patrick A.
    Chimowitz, Marc
    Turan, Tanya N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [7] COVID-19 pandemic and impact on cancer clinical trials: An academic medical center perspective
    Marcum, Michelle
    Kurtzweil, Nicky
    Vollmer, Christine
    Schmid, Lisa
    Vollmer, Ashley
    Kastl, Alison
    Acker, Kelly
    Gulati, Shuchi
    Grover, Punita
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Ahmad, Syed A.
    Sohal, Davendra
    Wise-Draper, Trisha M.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (17): : 6141 - 6146
  • [8] Pragmatic dose-escalation methods incorporating relative dose intensity assessment for molecularly targeted agents in phase I trials
    Hirakawa, Akihiro
    Tanaka, Yuichi
    Kaneko, Shuhei
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 16
  • [9] Assessment of Whether the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology's Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Measure Absolute or Relative Clinical Survival Benefit: An Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Saluja, Ronak
    Everest, Louis
    Cheng, Sierra
    Cheung, Matthew
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (08) : 1188 - 1194
  • [10] Relative dose intensity as a proxy measure of quality and prognosis in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in daily clinical practice
    Schraa, S. J.
    Frerichs, K. A.
    Agterof, M. J.
    Hunting, J. C. B.
    Los, M.
    de Jong, P. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 79 : 152 - 157