Exploring the heterogeneous impact of technological innovation on income inequality: Formulating the SDG policies for the BRICS-T economies

被引:6
作者
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Int Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, Nicosia, Turkiye
[2] Cyprus Int Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, Mersin 10, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Turkiye
关键词
Technological innovation; income inequality; BRICS-T nations; quantile-on-quantile regression; quantile causality; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X221145926
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present research evaluates the effect of technological innovation distribution on the distribution of income using data from between 1992Q1 and 2019Q4 for the BRICS-T (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Turkey) nations. The BRICS-T nations present a good case for this research since this problem could be more widespread in developing countries with high prospects for economic growth. The quantile causality and quantile-on-quantile regression techniques have been used to evaluate this association. The research findings provide a range of outcomes from different countries, which can be grouped into three categories; (i) Technological innovation impacts income inequality positively. (ii) Technological innovation distribution impacts income inequality distribution negatively. (iii) The effects of technology innovation on income distribution are not evenly distributed. Significant policy ramifications are deduced that might inspire sustainable development plans in the BRICS-T nations. This research is one of the first studies to demonstrate a direct connection between income inequality and technological innovation across various quantiles within a country. The study also effectively shows how these techniques are utilized to deduce the policy ramifications of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
引用
收藏
页码:1773 / 1792
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D, 2002, J ECON LIT, V40, P7
  • [2] Empowering the powerless: Does access to energy improve income inequality?
    Acheampong, Alex O.
    Dzator, Janet
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 99
  • [3] Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: What causes what and where?
    Acheampong, Alex O.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 : 677 - 692
  • [4] Another look at the nexus between economic growth trajectory and emission within the context of developing country: fresh insights from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Rjoub, Husam
    Agboola, Mary Oluwatoyin
    Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah
    Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (10) : 11397 - 11419
  • [5] Innovation and Top Income Inequality
    Aghion, Philippe
    Akcigit, Ufuk
    Bergeaud, Antonin
    Blundell, Richard
    Hemous, David
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) : 1 - 45
  • [6] Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach
    Antonelli, Cristiano
    Gehringer, Agnieszka
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 115 : 85 - 98
  • [7] On the Relationship between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities
    Breau, Sebastien
    Kogler, Dieter F.
    Bolton, Kenyon C.
    [J]. ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 90 (04) : 351 - 373
  • [8] Brock W, 1996, Econ Rev, V15, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07474939608800353, 10.1080/07474939608800353]
  • [9] Financial Development, Technological Innovation and Income Inequality: Time Series Evidence from Turkey
    Cetin, Murat
    Demir, Harun
    Saygin, Selin
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2021, 156 (01) : 47 - 69
  • [10] INVESTIGATING CAUSAL RELATIONS BY ECONOMETRIC MODELS AND CROSS-SPECTRAL METHODS
    GRANGER, CWJ
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1969, 37 (03) : 424 - 438