Aeroelastic Tailoring and Active Aeroelastic Wing Impact on a Lambda Wing Configuration

被引:11
作者
Alyanak, Edward J. [1 ]
Pendleton, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab, Aerosp Design & Anal Branch, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2017年 / 54卷 / 01期
关键词
COMPOSITE WINGS; OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.2514/1.C033040
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Two aeroelastic design approaches are applied to a supersonic lambda wing configuration with the goal of improving the wing's aeroelastic performance. Aeroelastic tailoring and active aeroelastic wing technologies are investigated in a sequential manner to quantify their benefits. Industry-standard tools are used to perform these design studies. First, a finite element model of a lambda wing is developed. Second, eight structural variants of the finite element model are created to study variations in wing stiffness. Finally, two sizing optimization processes are applied. The first is an aeroelastic sizing approach standard to MSC NASTRAN, and the second is an active aeroelastic wing design process, which is presented in this paper. The latter process integrates control and structural sizing design variables together. Both of these processes are used to size all eight structural variants. The optimized variants are compared based on weight and control surface effectiveness. Additionally, the optimal variations in percent ply utilization over the wing for the lightest weight concept are explored. It is found that applying aeroelastic tailoring simultaneously with active aeroelastic wing has the potential to reduce the aircraft gross takeoff weight by 7% in lambda wing configurations.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 19
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AEROELASTIC TAILORING OF HELICOPTER BLADES
    Cornette, Donatien
    Kerdreux, Benjamin
    Gourinat, Yves
    Michon, Guilhem
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2013, VOL 7A, 2014,
  • [22] Aeroelastic Tailoring of Helicopter Blades
    Cornette, Donatien
    Kerdreux, Benjamin
    Michon, Guilhem
    Gourinat, Yves
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [23] New biomimetic approach to the aircraft wing structural design based on aeroelastic analysis
    Gawel, D.
    Nowak, M.
    Hausa, H.
    Roszak, R.
    BULLETIN OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 65 (05) : 741 - 750
  • [24] Modeling composite wing aeroelastic behavior with uncertain damage severity and material properties
    Georgiou, G.
    Manan, A.
    Cooper, J. E.
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 32 : 32 - 43
  • [25] Effects of Thickness Variation on the Aeroelastic Performance of Continuous Tow Sheared Composite Wing
    Leitch, Harry J.
    Stodieck, Olivia
    Yuan, Jie
    AIAA SCITECH 2024 FORUM, 2024,
  • [26] Multi-objective optimization of a composite wing subject to strength and aeroelastic constraints
    Guo, S.
    Li, D.
    Liu, Y.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2012, 226 (G9) : 1095 - 1106
  • [27] Optimum Aeroelastic Design of Resonance Type Flapping Wing for Micro Air Vehicles
    Isogai, Koji
    Kamisawa, Yuichi
    Sato, Hiroyuki
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2010, 52 (178) : 238 - 245
  • [28] Computational investigation of variation in wing aerodynamic load under effect of aeroelastic deformations
    Hoang, Ngoc T. B.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (10) : 4665 - 4673
  • [29] Aeroelastic Tailoring of Composite Aircraft Wings
    Mihaila-Andres, Mihai
    Larco, Ciprian
    Rosu, Paul-Virgil
    Rotaru, Constantin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2016 (ICNAAM-2016), 2017, 1863
  • [30] Aeroelastic tailoring using lamination parameters
    Thuwis, Glenn A. A.
    De Breuker, Roeland
    Abdalla, Mostafa M.
    Gurdal, Zafer
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 41 (04) : 637 - 646