Incentives for community participation in the governance and management of common property resources: the case of community forest management in Nepal

被引:67
作者
Adhikari, Sunit [1 ]
Kingi, Tanira [2 ]
Ganesh, Siva [2 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Inst Nat Resources, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[2] AgResearch Ltd, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
关键词
Incentive; Participation; Community forestry; Resource governance; Property right; Nepal; COLLECTIVE ACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; NATURAL-RESOURCES; RIGHTS; DECENTRALIZATION; PAYMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Devolution of resource management access rights, from the state to local communities, has been an important policy tool in Nepal over the last two decades. One of the major goals of this policy is to increase the participation of local users in decision-making and for them to gain benefits from the forests. However, a lack of meaningful participation amongst users in resource governance has resulted in a failure to include socially marginalised groups in community decision-making. The main objective of this research is to explore what incentives are most likely to enhance the effective participation of local users in the governance and management of common property resources. In this study of community forestry management regimes in Nepal, access to resources and benefits, and enforcement of legal property rights are identified as the key influential incentives that determine the effective participation of users in resource governance. This study proposes proportional allocation of the most productive part of a community forest to a sub-group (formed within a user group) of the poor and disadvantaged members, and the transference and enforcement of legal property rights to this sub-group over the allocated forest, in order to protect their access rights to resources and to secure their greater participation in resource governance. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Local benefits from community forests in the middle hills of Nepal [J].
Adhikari, Bhim ;
Williams, Frances ;
Lovett, Jon C. .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 9 (05) :464-478
[2]   Poverty, property rights and collective action: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management [J].
Adhikari, H .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 10 :7-31
[3]   Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework [J].
Agarwal, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1623-1648
[4]   Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal's Terai [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gupta, K .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1101-1114
[5]   Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Ostrom, E .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2001, 29 (04) :485-514
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
[7]  
Aryal B., 2006, 3 WORLD C 3 7 JUL 20
[8]  
Bajracharya B., 2008, THESIS MASSEY U PALM
[9]  
Baland J. M., 1996, Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities?
[10]  
Bhatia A., 1999, Participatory Forest Management: Implications for Policy and Human Resources' Development in the Hindu-Kush Himalayas, V5