Is 3-hour cyclosporine blood level superior to trough level in early post-renal transplantation period?

被引:19
作者
Mahalati, K [1 ]
Lawen, J
Kiberd, B
Belitsky, P
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Kidney Transplant Program, Queen Elizabeth II Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Urol, Queen Elizabeth II Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, Queen Elizabeth II Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
kidney; cyclosporine; drug monitoring; kidney transplantation; rejection;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67967-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cyclosporine dose is traditionally based on trough blood levels. Cyclosporine trough blood level correlates poorly with acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation. We determined whether cyclosporine blood level at any other time point is superior to cyclosporine trough blood level as a predictor of acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Materials and Methods: Cyclosporine blood level was measured before (trough), and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after the dose in 156 initial renal transplant cases 2 to 4 days after the initiation of cyclosporine micro-emulsion formula administration, The cylosporine micro-emulsion dose was based on cyclosporine trough blood level targeting 250 to 400 mu g./l. Results: Regression analysis revealed that only delayed graft function (p = 0.007) and cyclosporine blood level after 3 hours (p = 0.008) predicted acute rejection. Mean cyclosporine trough blood level plus or minus standard error was not significantly different in patients with and without acute rejection (293 +/- 21 versus 294 +/- 11 mu g./l.). Mean cyclosporine blood level after 3 hours was significantly lower in patients with acute rejection (1,156 +/- 90 versus 1,421 +/- 50, p = 0.008). Cases were divided into tertiles at levels after 3 hours (1,100 and 1,500 mu g./l.). The group in which the level after 3 hours was less than 1,100 mu g./l. had the highest acute rejection rate (22 of 50 patients, 44%) and a cyclosporine nephrotoxicity rate of 13% (7 of 52 patients). The group in which the level after 3 hours was 1,100 to 1,500 mu g./l. had the lowest acute rejection rate (5 of 46 patients, 11%) without increased cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (7 of 52 patients, 13%). A level after 3 hours of greater than 1,500 mu g./l. was associated with a rejection rate of 15% (7 of 47 patients) but significantly higher cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (16 of 52 patients, 30%). Conclusions: Cyclosporine blood level after 3 hours in the early post-transplantation period is associated with acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. A cyclosporine blood level range after 3 hours of 1,100 to 1,500 mu g./l. is associated with an optimal outcome. Our data suggest that cyclosporine blood level after 3 hours may represent a better method of monitoring cyclosporine micro-emulsion dose than cyclosporine trough blood level. This hypothesis must be further studied in randomized trials.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The pharmacokinetics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in primary renal allograft recipients
    Barone, G
    Chang, CT
    Choc, MG
    Klein, JB
    Marsh, CL
    Meligeni, JA
    Min, DI
    Pescovitz, MD
    Pollak, R
    Pruett, TL
    Stinson, JB
    Thompson, JS
    Vasquez, E
    Waid, T
    Wombolt, DG
    Wong, RL
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 61 (06) : 875 - 880
  • [2] The safety and tolerability of cyclosporine emulsion versus cyclosporine in a randomized, double-blind comparison in primary renal allograft recipients
    Barone, G
    Bunke, CM
    Choc, MG
    Hricik, DE
    Jin, JHJ
    Klein, JB
    Marsh, CL
    Min, DI
    Pescovitz, MD
    Pollak, R
    Pruett, TL
    Stinson, JB
    Thompson, JS
    Vasquez, E
    Waid, T
    Wombolt, DG
    Wong, RL
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 61 (06) : 968 - 970
  • [3] Comparison of neoral dose monitoring with cyclosporine trough levels versus 2-hr postdose levels in stable liver transplant patients
    Cantarovich, M
    Barkun, JS
    Tchervenkov, JI
    Besner, JG
    Aspeslet, L
    Metrakos, P
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) : 1621 - 1627
  • [4] Cantarovich M, 1998, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V12, P243
  • [5] Comparison of cyclosporine monitoring with trough levels to levels obtained 6 hours after the morning dose in heart transplant patients: A prospective randomized study
    Cantarovich, M
    Latter, D
    Fitchett, D
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (1-2) : 602 - 604
  • [6] Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection -: Results of a prospective, randomized comparison of neoral and sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8)
    Grant, D
    Kneteman, N
    Tchervenkov, J
    Roy, A
    Murphy, G
    Tan, A
    Hendricks, L
    Guilbault, N
    Levy, G
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (08) : 1133 - 1137
  • [7] HOLT DW, 1994, TRANSPL P, V26, P2935
  • [8] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CYCLOSPORINE PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS AND SUBSEQUENT ACUTE REJECTION IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    KASISKE, BL
    HEIMDUTHOY, K
    RAO, KV
    AWNI, WM
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1988, 46 (05) : 716 - 722
  • [9] Clinical development of a cyclosporine microemulsion in transplantation
    Kovarik, JM
    Mueller, EA
    Niese, D
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1996, 18 (04) : 429 - 434
  • [10] Levy GA, 1998, TRANSPLANT P, V30, P1826