The effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care in Guangdong Province, China: a cross-sectional study using primary care assessment tool-adult edition

被引:17
|
作者
Liang, Cuiying [1 ]
Mei, Jie [1 ]
Liang, Yuan [1 ]
Hu, Ruwei [1 ]
Li, Li [2 ,3 ]
Kuang, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Adm, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Family Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gatekeeping; Primary care; Quality of primary care; Propensity score matching; Cross-sectional survey; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; PLAN; EXPERIENCE; EFFICIENCY; REFERRALS; PHYSICIAN; SERVICES; SHENZHEN; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-019-0982-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundDeveloped countries have widely implemented a gatekeeping system as a core policy of primary care, also known as the system of first visit in the community. As gatekeepers, general practitioners are responsible for the diagnosis and treatment of residents in the community health centres, andreferring patients to specialists as appropriate. After several years of healthcare reform, gatekeeping policy has achieved remarkable success in China. Shenzhen and Dongguan were the first batch of pilot cities that implemented the policy of gatekeeping. This study aims to examine the effects of gatekeeping on the quality of primary care between the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping groups in these two pilot cities.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in five community health centres in Shenzhen and Dongguan cities, both located within Guangdong Province, China, using a validated Chinese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Adult Edition (PCAT-AE) and carrying out face-to-face interviews with patients 18years and older. Analyses were grouped according to whether or not patients had gatekeepers. Propensity Score Matching was used to control for confounding factors. A chi-square test was used to compare the factors mentioned above and an independent t-test was performed to compare the eight domains of the core functions of primary care between the two groups of patients.ResultsIn total, 765 valid questionnaires were collected for analysis, after matching the sample size were 238 pairs. All the confounding factors observed between the gatekeeping and non-gatekeeping groups were balanced. The PCAT-AE scores for first-contact utilisation (3.29>2.66, p<0.001) and coordination (2.06>1.95, p<0.05) were higher in the gatekeeping group after matching, but the domains of accessibility (1.59<1.67, p<0.05) and continuity (2.26<2.40, p<0.05) were lower. The PCAT-AE mean score was slightly higher in gatekeeping group (1.98>1.93, p>0.05) but without statistical significance.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that gatekeeping has helped to improve first-contact utilisation and coordination of primary care, but that other goals such as continuity and comprehensiveness have been harmed. To establish a sustainable gatekeeping system and to strengthen the core functions of the community comprehensively, the current gatekeeping system needs refinement.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in a primary care area: A cross-sectional study
    Fernandez-Urrusuno, Rocio
    Flores-Dorado, Macarena
    Vilches-Arenas, Angel
    Serrano-Martino, Carmen
    Corral-Baena, Susana
    Carmen Montero-Balosa, M.
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2014, 32 (05): : 285 - 292
  • [42] Mental health of postgraduate trainees in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Till J. Bugaj
    Katja Krug
    Annalena Rentschler
    Christoph Nikendei
    Joachim Szecsenyi
    Simon Schwill
    BMC Family Practice, 21
  • [43] Padiatric Asthma in Canada 2016: A cross-sectional study in primary care
    Cave, Andrew
    Gillies, Christina
    Aponte-Hao, Sylvia
    Soos, Boglarka
    Williamson, Tyler
    Drummond, Neil
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [44] Comorbidity of dementia: a cross-sectional study of primary care older patients
    Poblador-Plou, Beatriz
    Calderon-Larranaga, Amaia
    Marta-Moreno, Javier
    Hancco-Saavedra, Jorge
    Sicras-Mainar, Antoni
    Soljak, Michael
    Prados-Torres, Alexandra
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
  • [45] Use of delayed antibiotic prescription in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    de la Poza Abad, Mariam
    Mas Dalmau, Gemma
    Gich Saladich, Ignasi
    Martinez Garcia, Laura
    Llor, Carl
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [46] Measuring perceptions of safety climate in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    de Wet, Carl
    Johnson, Paul
    Mash, Robert
    McConnachie, Alex
    Bowie, Paul
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [47] Relationship between patient-perceived quality of primary care and self-reported hospital utilisation in China: A cross-sectional study
    Zhong, Chenwen
    Huang, Junjie
    Li, Lina
    Luo, Zhuojun
    Liang, Cuiying
    Zhou, Mengping
    Hu, Nan
    Kuang, Li
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [48] Mental health of postgraduate trainees in primary care: a cross-sectional study
    Bugaj, Till J.
    Krug, Katja
    Rentschler, Annalena
    Nikendei, Christoph
    Szecsenyi, Joachim
    Schwill, Simon
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [49] Quality of Patient-Physician Discussions About CKD in Primary Care: A Cross-sectional Study
    Greer, Raquel C.
    Cooper, Lisa A.
    Crews, Deidra C.
    Powe, Neil R.
    Boulware, L. Ebony
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2011, 57 (04) : 583 - 591
  • [50] Association of Lifestyle Behaviors with Quality of Life in Patients with COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care
    Bouloukaki, Izolde
    Christodoulakis, Antonios
    Margetaki, Katerina
    Tsiligianni, Ioanna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (16)