Improvement in Work Ability, Psychological Distress and Pain Sites in Relation to Low Back Pain Prognosis A Longitudinal Observational Study in Primary Care

被引:28
|
作者
Nordstoga, Anne L. [1 ]
Vasseljen, Ottar [1 ]
Meisingset, Ingebrigt [1 ]
Nilsen, Tom I. L. [1 ,2 ]
Unsgaard-Tondel, Monica [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olays Hosp, Clin Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Municipal, Dept Physiotherapy, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
disability; distress; low back pain; musculoskeletal pain; pain sites; psychological; quality of life; work ability; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH; DISABILITY; INTERVENTION; LIFE; RESPONSIVENESS; ASSOCIATIONS; PREDICTION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002860
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Prospective observational study pooled from two clinical cohorts. Objective. To investigate the longitudinal relation between multisite pain, psychological distress, and work ability with disability, pain, and quality of life. Summary of Background Data. Knowledge of prognostic factors is essential for better management of patients with low back pain (LBP). All domains of the biopsychosocial model have shown prognostic value; however, clinical studies rarely incorporate all domains when studying treatment outcome for patients with LBP. Methods. A total of 165 patients with nonspecific LBP seeking primary care physiotherapy were included. Mixed-effects models were used to estimate longitudinal relations between the exposure variables and concurrent measures of outcomes at baseline and 3 months. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for minimal important difference in outcome. Results. Higher work ability was associated with less disability 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3, 2.0), less pain: 0.4 (95% CI: 0.5, 0.3), and higher quality of life 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.04). Higher psychological distress and number of pain sites were associated with higher disability: 10.9 (95% CI: 7.7, 14.1) and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.4, 3.2) higher pain: 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.5) and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.5), and lower quality of life: 0.1 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.1) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.01), respectively. Improvement in work ability showed consistent associations with successful outcome for disability (odds ratio [OR]: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.3, 18.1), pain (OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 12.1), and quality of life (OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 1.4, 15.1) at 3 months. Reduced psychological distress was associated with improvement in pain only (OR 4.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 12.3). Conclusion. More pain sites, higher psychological distress, or lower work ability showed higher disability, more pain, and lower quality of life in patients with LBP. Only improvement in work ability was consistently related to successful outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:E423 / E429
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Pain, Functioning, Coping, and Psychological Distress in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Evaluated for Spinal Cord Stimulator Implant or Behavioral Pain Management
    Davis, Claude Ervin, III
    Kyle, Brandon N.
    Thorp, Jacob
    Wu, Qiang
    Firnhaber, Juan
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (04) : 753 - 760
  • [42] Prevalence and Characteristics of Widespread Pain in Female Primary Health Care Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
    Nordeman, Lena
    Gunnarsson, Ronny
    Mannerkorpi, Kaisa
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 28 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [43] Underreporting of work-related low back pain among registered nurses: A mixed method study
    Kwon, Suyoung
    Lee, Soo Jeong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2023, 66 (11) : 952 - 964
  • [44] Prognostic Indicators of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: Five-Year Prospective Study
    Campbell, Paul
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Thomas, Elaine
    Dunn, Kate M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 14 (08) : 873 - 883
  • [45] Investigating the Primary Care Management of Low Back Pain: A Simulated Patient Study
    Shaheed, Christina Abdel
    McFarlane, Brett
    Maher, Chris G.
    Williams, Kylie A.
    Bergin, Jenny
    Matthews, Andrew
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 17 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [46] Low back pain - A primary care challenge
    Deyo, RA
    Phillips, WR
    SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) : 2826 - 2832
  • [47] Validity and Reproducibility of the STarT Back Tool (Dutch Version) in Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Settings
    Bier, Jasper D.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    van Hooff, Miranda L.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 97 (05): : 561 - 570
  • [48] Prevalence, Characteristics, and Clinical Course of Neuropathic Pain in Primary Care Patients Consulting With Low Back-related Leg Pain
    Harrisson, Sarah A.
    Ogollah, Reuben
    Dunn, Kate M.
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Konstantinou, Kika
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 36 (11) : 813 - 824
  • [49] Does group-based cognitive therapy improve functional ability, pain, catastrophic thoughts and quality of life in patients with persistent low back pain and psychological risk factors? A randomised controlled trial in a secondary care setting
    Rolving, Nanna
    Agerbo, Karina
    Clausen, Stine Aalkjaer
    Denby, Kate Ane Rauff
    Jacobsen, Anna Puk
    Langagergaard, Vivian
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (03) : 317 - 330
  • [50] Diagnosis and management of low-back pain in primary care
    Traeger, Adrian
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Harris, Ian
    Maher, Chris
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (45) : E1386 - E1395