The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure

被引:283
作者
Condon, David M. [1 ]
Revelle, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cognitive ability; Intelligence; Online assessment; Psychometric validation; Public-domain measures; GRADE-POINT AVERAGES; SAMPLE SELECTION; MODELS; SCORES; COMMON; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
For all of its versatility and sophistication, the extant toolkit of cognitive ability measures lacks a public-domain method for large-scale, remote data collection. While the lack of copyright protection for such a measure poses a theoretical threat to test validity, the effective magnitude of this threat is unknown and can be offset by the use of modern test-development techniques. To the extent that validity can be maintained, the benefits of a public-domain resource are considerable for researchers, including: cost savings; greater control over test content; and the potential for more nuanced understanding of the correlational structure between constructs. The International Cognitive Ability Resource was developed to evaluate the prospects for such a public-domain measure and the psychometric properties of the first four item types were evaluated based on administrations to both an offline university sample and a large online sample. Concurrent and discriminative validity analyses suggest that the public-domain status of these item types did not compromise their validity despite administration to 97,000 participants. Further development and validation of extant and additional item types are recommended. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 64
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[31]   Protecting Raw Data and Psychological Tests from Wrongful Disclosure: A Primer on the Law and Other Persuasive Strategies [J].
Kaufmann, Paul M. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2009, 23 (07) :1130-1159
[32]  
Kenny D.A., 2011, Measuring Model Fit
[33]   ACT and general cognitive ability [J].
Koenig, Katherine A. ;
Frey, Meredith C. ;
Detterman, Douglas K. .
INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 36 (02) :153-160
[34]   The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores:: A meta-analysis and review of the literature [J].
Kuncel, NR ;
Credé, M ;
Thomas, LL .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 75 (01) :63-82
[35]   Development and initial validation of public domain Basic Interest Markers [J].
Liao, Hsin-Ya ;
Armstrong, Patrick Ian ;
Rounds, James .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2008, 73 (01) :159-183
[36]   SAMPLING FLUCTUATIONS RESULTING FROM THE SAMPLING OF TEST ITEMS [J].
Lord, Frederic M. .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1955, 20 (01) :1-22
[37]   Overestimation bias in self-reported SAT scores [J].
Mayer, Richard E. ;
Stull, Andrew T. ;
Campbell, Julie ;
Almeroth, Kevin ;
Bimber, Bruce ;
Chun, Dorothy ;
Knight, Allan .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (04) :443-454
[38]  
McCaffrey R.J., 2009, NYS PSYCHOL, VXXI, P27
[39]  
Murphy L. L., 2011, TESTS PRINT 8 INDEX