The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure

被引:274
作者
Condon, David M. [1 ]
Revelle, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cognitive ability; Intelligence; Online assessment; Psychometric validation; Public-domain measures; GRADE-POINT AVERAGES; SAMPLE SELECTION; MODELS; SCORES; COMMON; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
For all of its versatility and sophistication, the extant toolkit of cognitive ability measures lacks a public-domain method for large-scale, remote data collection. While the lack of copyright protection for such a measure poses a theoretical threat to test validity, the effective magnitude of this threat is unknown and can be offset by the use of modern test-development techniques. To the extent that validity can be maintained, the benefits of a public-domain resource are considerable for researchers, including: cost savings; greater control over test content; and the potential for more nuanced understanding of the correlational structure between constructs. The International Cognitive Ability Resource was developed to evaluate the prospects for such a public-domain measure and the psychometric properties of the first four item types were evaluated based on administrations to both an offline university sample and a large online sample. Concurrent and discriminative validity analyses suggest that the public-domain status of these item types did not compromise their validity despite administration to 97,000 participants. Further development and validation of extant and additional item types are recommended. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 64
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[2]  
Arendasy M., 2006, Journal of Individual Di_erences, V27, P2
[3]  
Baker F. B., 1985, BASICS ITEM RESPONSE
[4]  
Brown A., 2013, STANDARD ERRORS SAPA, P1
[5]   CORRECTING CORRELATIONS FOR RESTRICTIONS IN RANGE DUE TO SELECTION ON AN UNMEASURED VARIABLE [J].
BRYANT, ND ;
GOKHALE, S .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1972, 32 (02) :305-&
[6]   Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology [J].
Camara, WJ ;
Nathan, JS ;
Puente, AE .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2000, 31 (02) :141-154
[7]  
Carroll B J., 1993, Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies
[8]  
Cassady J., 2001, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V7
[9]   THE MEASUREMENT OF ADULT INTELLIGENCE [J].
Cattell, Raymond B. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1943, 40 (03) :153-193
[10]  
Clark S.J., 2012, 120 CTR STAT SOC SCI, P1