Safety citizenship behavior (SCB) in the workplace: A stable construct? Analysis of psychometric invariance across four European countries

被引:34
作者
Curcuruto, Matteo [1 ]
Conchie, Stacey M. [2 ]
Griffin, Mark A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Beckett Univ, Leeds Sch Social Sci, City Campus, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster LA1 4YF, England
[3] Curtin Univ, Future Work Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
Safety citizenship; Cross-National research; Affiliative behavior; Change oriented behavior; Factor structure; Multi-Group analysis; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; MEDIATING ROLE; FIT INDEXES; CLIMATE; MODEL; CLUSTER; DIMENSIONS; EXCHANGE; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.023
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Safety citizenship behaviors (SCBs) are important participative organizational behaviors that emerge in work groups. SCBs create a work environment that supports individual and team safety, encourages a proactive management of workplace safety, and ultimately, prevents accidents. In spite of the importance of SCBs, little consensus exists on research issues like the dimensionality of safety citizenship, and if any superordinate factor level of safety citizenship should be conceptualized, and thus measured. The present study addressed this issue by examining the dimensionality of SCBs, as they relate to behaviors of helping, stewardship, civic virtue, whistleblowing, voice, and initiating change in current practices. Data on SCBs were collected from four industrial plants (N = 1065) in four European countries (Italy, Russia, Switzerland, United Kingdom). The results show that SCBs structure around two superordinate second-order factors that reflect affiliation and challenge. Multi-group analyses supported the structure and metric invariance of the two-factor model across the four national subsamples.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 201
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Gottfredson, Ryan K. ;
Joo, Harry .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (02) :270-301
[2]  
Anderson DR., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, V2nd
[3]   The Anglo Cluster: legacy of the British empire [J].
Ashkanasy, NM ;
Trevor-Roberts, E ;
Earnshaw, L .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2002, 37 (01) :28-39
[4]   Eastern European cluster:: tradition and transition [J].
Bakacsi, G ;
Sándor, T ;
András, K ;
Viktor, I .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2002, 37 (01) :69-80
[5]   Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology [J].
Bandalos, Deborah L. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (02) :211-240
[6]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[7]  
Bollen K. A., 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
[8]   CRITICAL COMMENTS ON APPLYING COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING [J].
BRANNICK, MT .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 16 (03) :201-213
[9]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2
[10]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445