Identification and Prioritization of Cloud Based Global Software Development Best Practices

被引:12
作者
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem [1 ]
Mahmood, Sajjad [2 ]
Alsalman, Hussain [3 ,4 ]
Razzaq, Abdul [5 ]
Gumaei, Abdu [3 ]
Riaz, Muhammad Tanveer [6 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Informat Syst, Res Chair Pervas & Mobile Comp, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia
[5] Muhammad Nawaz Shareef Univ Agr, Dept Comp Sci, Multan 66000, Pakistan
[6] Univ Engn & Technol Faisalabad, Dept Mechatron & Control Engn, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2020年 / 8卷 / 08期
关键词
Organizations; Best practices; Cloud computing; Industries; Software as a service; Computer science; Cloud based global software development (CGSD); best practices; fuzzy-AHP; REQUIREMENTS CHANGE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; REVIEWS; TRUST; VIEW;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031365
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The cloud based global software development (CGSD) is the most widely adopted development paradigm in software industry. The CGSD offers significant economic and strategic benefits; besides, various complexities are faced by the practitioners while deploying CGSD. Hence, this study aims to identify and prioritize the best practices that are important for the success and progression of CGSD paradigm. Using the systematic literature review a total of 30 best practices were identified and were further verified with industry experts using questionnaire survey study. The identified best practices were further prioritize using fuzzy-AHP approach. The fuzzy-AHP is novel in this domain as it successfully applied in other engineering domain to address the multicriteria decision making problems. The findings of this study will provide a prioritization-based taxonomy of the investigated best practices which assists the academic researchers and industry experts to develop and revise the strategies of CGSD.
引用
收藏
页码:191242 / 191262
页数:21
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [21] Easterbrook Steve, 2008, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, P285, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-511, 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_11, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_11]
  • [22] A review of outsourcing from the resource-based view of the firm
    Espino-Rodríguez, TF
    Padrón-Robaina, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 8 (01) : 49 - 70
  • [23] Finstad K, 2010, J USABILITY STUD, V5, P104
  • [24] Information technology workforce skills: The software and IT services provider perspective
    Goles, Tim
    Hawk, Stephen
    Kaiser, Kate M.
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2008, 10 (02) : 179 - 194
  • [25] A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem
    Gungor, Zulal
    Serhadlioglu, Guerkan
    Kesen, Saadettin Erhan
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2009, 9 (02) : 641 - 646
  • [26] A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges
    Inayat, Irum
    Salim, Siti Salwah
    Marczak, Sabrina
    Daneva, Maya
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 51 : 915 - 929
  • [27] Identification and prioritization of coordination barriers in humanitarian supply chain management
    Kabra, Gaurav
    Ramesh, A.
    Arshinder, Kaur
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2015, 13 : 128 - 138
  • [28] Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey
    Kahraman, C
    Cebeci, U
    Ruan, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2004, 87 (02) : 171 - 184
  • [29] Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Engin, Orhan
    Kabak, Oezguer
    Kaya, Ihsan
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2009, 22 (06) : 832 - 841
  • [30] Kaiser K. M., 2008, MIS Q EXECUTIVE, V3, P3