Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study

被引:4
|
作者
Sato, Noriko [1 ]
Fujita, Kenji [2 ,3 ]
Kushida, Kazuki [4 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Dept Aged Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Showa Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Pharm, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Community pharmacy; Geriatric pharmacotherapy; Older people; Primary care; Quality indicators; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; SCREENING TOOL; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH; PHARMACISTS; PRESCRIPTIONS; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-022-01375-x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug events in older people. Although national guidance on geriatric pharmacotherapy exists in Japan, tools to routinely monitor the quality of care provided by community pharmacists are lacking. Aim To develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) to measure the quality of care provided by community pharmacists in improving geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care in Japan, using a modified Delphi study. Method The development of QIs for the Japanese community pharmacy context followed a two-step process: national guidance review and consensus testing using a modified Delphi study. The latter involved two rounds of rating with a face-to-face meeting between the rounds. Ten experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care were recruited for the panel discussion. QIs were mapped to three key taxonomies and frameworks: the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, problems and causes of drug-related problems (DRPs) taxonomy and Donabedian's framework. Results A total of 134 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy were developed. This QI set included 111 medicine specific indicators, covering medicines in 243 third-level ATC classifications. QIs were classified into the problem of treatment safety (80%) and causes of drug selection (38%) based on validated classification for DRPs. In Donabedian's framework, most QIs (82%) were process indicators. There were no structure indicators. Conclusion A set of 134 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was rigorously developed. Measurement properties of these QIs will be evaluated for feasibility, applicability, room for improvement, sensitivity to change, predictive validity, acceptability and implementation issues in a subsequent study.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 538
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach
    Canning, Martin Luke
    Barras, Michael
    McDougall, Ross
    Yerkovich, Stephanie
    Coombes, Ian
    Sullivan, Clair
    Whitfield, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (02) : 451 - 462
  • [42] FAIRSTEPS study - Framework Addressing Inequities in pRimary care using STakEholder PerspectiveS: Integrative evidence review and Delphi consensus
    Jackson, Ben
    Mitchell, Caroline
    Coster, Joanne
    Lawy, Tom
    Burton, Chris
    Reynolds, Josephine
    Essat, Munira
    Cantrell, Anna
    Clowes, Mark
    Ariss, Steven
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 237 : 307 - 315
  • [43] Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach
    Martin Luke Canning
    Michael Barras
    Ross McDougall
    Stephanie Yerkovich
    Ian Coombes
    Clair Sullivan
    Karen Whitfield
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2024, 46 : 451 - 462
  • [44] Identifying potential outcomes of patient engagement in primary care quality improvement: a modified Delphi study
    Pandhi, Nancy
    Jacobson, Nora
    Crowder, Madison
    Quanbeck, Andrew
    Davis, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [45] Agreeing the content of a patient-reported outcome measure for primary care: a Delphi consensus study
    Murphy, Mairead
    Hollinghurst, Sandra
    Salisbury, Chris
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (02) : 335 - 348
  • [46] Development of prescribing indicators related to opioid-related harm in patients with chronic pain in primary care—a modified e-Delphi study
    Neetu Bansal
    Stephen M. Campbell
    Chiu-Yi Lin
    Darren M. Ashcroft
    Li-Chia Chen
    BMC Medicine, 22
  • [47] Quality Indicators during Delivery and the Immediate Postpartum Period: A Modified Delphi Study
    Guiguet-Auclair, Candy
    Riviere, Olivier
    Gerbaud, Laurent
    Vendittelli, Francoise
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [48] Development of quality indicators for antimicrobial stewardship in Belgian hospitals: a RAND - modified Delphi procedure
    Legros, Sylvie
    Vanoverschelde, Anna
    van Krieken, Jens
    Debaveye, Yves
    Versporten, Ann
    In't Veld, Diana Huis
    Westelinck, Veerle
    Briquet, Caroline
    Vercheval, Christelle
    Spriet, Isabel
    Denis, Olivier
    Magerman, Koen
    De Schepper, Marc
    Buyle, Franky
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2024, 79 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [49] Development of Quality Indicators for Cardiac Rehabilitation in Australia: A Modified Delphi Method and Pilot Test
    Zecchin, Robert
    Candelaria, Dion
    Ferry, Cate
    Ladak, Laila Akbar
    McIvor, Dawn
    Wilcox, Kerry
    Bennett, Alexandra
    Bowen, Sheryl
    Carr, Bridie
    Randall, Sue
    Gallagher, Robyn
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (11) : 1622 - 1630
  • [50] Development of Population-Based Cancer Indicators and a Measurement of Cancer Care Continuum Using a Modified Delphi Method
    Rajaguru, Vasuki
    Jang, Jieun
    Kim, JaeHyun
    Kwon, JeoungA
    Cho, Oyeon
    Chung, SeungYeun
    Ahn, MiSun
    Park, JinHee
    Won, YoungJoo
    Jung, KyuWon
    Shin, Jaeyong
    Chun, Mison
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (19)