Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study

被引:6
作者
Sato, Noriko [1 ]
Fujita, Kenji [2 ,3 ]
Kushida, Kazuki [4 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Dept Aged Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Showa Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Pharm, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Community pharmacy; Geriatric pharmacotherapy; Older people; Primary care; Quality indicators; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; SCREENING TOOL; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH; PHARMACISTS; PRESCRIPTIONS; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-022-01375-x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug events in older people. Although national guidance on geriatric pharmacotherapy exists in Japan, tools to routinely monitor the quality of care provided by community pharmacists are lacking. Aim To develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) to measure the quality of care provided by community pharmacists in improving geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care in Japan, using a modified Delphi study. Method The development of QIs for the Japanese community pharmacy context followed a two-step process: national guidance review and consensus testing using a modified Delphi study. The latter involved two rounds of rating with a face-to-face meeting between the rounds. Ten experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care were recruited for the panel discussion. QIs were mapped to three key taxonomies and frameworks: the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, problems and causes of drug-related problems (DRPs) taxonomy and Donabedian's framework. Results A total of 134 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy were developed. This QI set included 111 medicine specific indicators, covering medicines in 243 third-level ATC classifications. QIs were classified into the problem of treatment safety (80%) and causes of drug selection (38%) based on validated classification for DRPs. In Donabedian's framework, most QIs (82%) were process indicators. There were no structure indicators. Conclusion A set of 134 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was rigorously developed. Measurement properties of these QIs will be evaluated for feasibility, applicability, room for improvement, sensitivity to change, predictive validity, acceptability and implementation issues in a subsequent study.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 538
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Pharmaceutical Care: the PCNE definition 2013 [J].
Allemann, Samuel S. ;
van Mil, J. W. Foppe ;
Botermann, Lea ;
Berger, Karin ;
Griese, Nina ;
Hersberger, Kurt E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2014, 36 (03) :544-555
[2]   Seasonal influenza vaccination delivery through community pharmacists in England: evaluation of the London pilot [J].
Atkins, Katherine ;
van Hoek, Albert Jan ;
Watson, Conall ;
Baguelin, Marc ;
Choga, Lethiwe ;
Patel, Anika ;
Raj, Thara ;
Jit, Mark ;
Griffiths, Ulla .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (02)
[3]   Application of drug-related problem (DRP) classification systems: a review of the literature [J].
Basger, Benjamin J. ;
Moles, Rebekah J. ;
Chen, Timothy F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 70 (07) :799-815
[4]   Impact of pharmacist administration of influenza vaccines on uptake in Canada [J].
Buchan, Sarah A. ;
Rosella, Laura C. ;
Finkelstein, Michael ;
Juurlink, David ;
Isenor, Jennifer ;
Marra, Fawziah ;
Patel, Anik ;
Russell, Margaret L. ;
Quach, Susan ;
Waite, Nancy ;
Kwong, Jeffrey C. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (04) :E146-E152
[5]   Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Braspenning, J ;
Hutchinson, A ;
Marshall, M .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (04) :358-364
[6]   Framework and indicator testing protocol for developing and piloting quality indicators for the UK quality and outcomes framework [J].
Campbell, Stephen M. ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Hannon, Kerin ;
Burke, Martyn ;
Barber, Annette ;
Lester, Helen E. .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 12
[7]   Development of Quality Indicators to Assess Oral Anticoagulant Management in Community Pharmacies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation [J].
Chartrand, Mylene ;
Guenette, Line ;
Brouillette, Denis ;
Cote, Stephane ;
Huot, Roger ;
Landry, Jerome ;
Martineau, Josee ;
Perreault, Sylvie ;
White-Guay, Brian ;
Williamson, David ;
Martin, Elisabeth ;
Gagnon, Marie-Mireille ;
Lalonde, Lyne .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2018, 24 (04) :357-365
[8]  
Donabedian A., 1980, Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Volume 1. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, V1
[9]   Updating the beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults - Results of a US consensus panel of experts [J].
Fick, DM ;
Cooper, JW ;
Wade, WE ;
Waller, JL ;
Maclean, JR ;
Beers, MH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (22) :2716-2724
[10]   American Geriatrics Society Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults [J].
Fick, Donna ;
Semla, Todd ;
Beizer, Judith ;
Dombrowski, Robert ;
Brandt, Nicole ;
DuBeau, Catherine E. ;
Flanagan, Nina ;
Hanlon, Joseph ;
Hollmann, Peter ;
Linnebur, Sunny ;
Nau, David ;
Rehm, Bob ;
Sandhu, Satinderpal ;
Steinman, Michael .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (04) :616-631