Do you know your r2?

被引:13
作者
Avdeef, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] In ADME Res, 1732 First Ave 102, New York, NY 10128 USA
来源
ADMET AND DMPK | 2021年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
coefficient of determination; linear correction coefficient; root-mean-square error; linear regression; EVALUATE; MODELS;
D O I
10.5599/admet.888
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r(2)), Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (r(Pearson)), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from 'beyond the Rule of 5' chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive 'bias-tilt' systematic type scatter. (c) 2021 by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bouncing inflation in a nonlinear R2 + R4 gravitational model
    Saidov, Tamerlan
    Zhuk, Alexander
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2010, 81 (12)
  • [32] Asymptotic confidence interval for R2 in multiple linear regression
    Dedecker, J.
    Guedj, O.
    Taupin, M. L.
    STATISTICS, 2025, 59 (01) : 1 - 36
  • [33] Wormhole structures in logarithmic-corrected R2 gravity
    Fayyaz, I
    Shamir, M. Farasat
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2020, 80 (05):
  • [34] Improved estimators of correlation and R2 for skewed hydrologic data
    Barber, Caitline
    Lamontagne, Jonathan R.
    Vogel, Richard M.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2020, 65 (01): : 87 - 101
  • [35] Nonminimal Coleman-Weinberg inflation with an R2 term
    Karam, Alexandros
    Pappas, Thomas
    Tamvakis, Kyriakos
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2019, (02):
  • [36] Primordial perturbations generated by Higgs field and R2 operator
    Wang, Yun-Chao
    Wang, Tower
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2017, 96 (12)
  • [37] Adjusted R2 - type measures for beta regression model
    Mahmood, Shaimaa Waleed
    Seyala, Noor Nawzat
    Algamal, Zakariya Yahya
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 13 (02) : 350 - 357
  • [38] "How do you know someone's vegan?" They won't always tell you. An empirical test of the do-gooder's dilemma
    Bolderdijk, Jan Willem
    Cornelissen, Gert
    APPETITE, 2022, 168
  • [39] Pressure effects in the weak-field limit of f(R) = R plus αR2 gravity
    Sbisa, Fulvio
    Piattella, Oliver F.
    Joras, Sergio E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2019, 99 (10):
  • [40] On the initial conditions for inflation with plateau potentials: the R plus R2 (super)gravity case
    Dalianis, Ioannis
    Farakos, Fotis
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, (07):