Do you know your r2?

被引:13
作者
Avdeef, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] In ADME Res, 1732 First Ave 102, New York, NY 10128 USA
来源
ADMET AND DMPK | 2021年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
coefficient of determination; linear correction coefficient; root-mean-square error; linear regression; EVALUATE; MODELS;
D O I
10.5599/admet.888
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r(2)), Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (r(Pearson)), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from 'beyond the Rule of 5' chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive 'bias-tilt' systematic type scatter. (c) 2021 by the authors. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wormhole solutions in f(R,T) = R plus αR2 + βlnT gravity
    Godani, Nisha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC METHODS IN MODERN PHYSICS, 2023, 20 (03)
  • [22] Strongest constraint in f(R) = R plus αR2 gravity: stellar stability
    Pretel, Juan M. Z.
    Joras, Sergio E.
    Reis, Ribamar R. R.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2020, (11):
  • [23] Out-of-Sample R2: Estimation and Inference
    Hawinkel, Stijn
    Waegeman, Willem
    Maere, Steven
    AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2024, 78 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [24] Quantifying R2 bias in the presence of measurement error
    Majeske, Karl D.
    Lynch-Caris, Terri
    Brelin-Fornari, Janet
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2010, 37 (04) : 667 - 677
  • [25] Dynamical analysis of loop quantum R2 cosmology
    Chen, Long
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2019, 99 (06)
  • [26] On the degrees of freedom of R2 gravity in flat spacetime
    Hell, Anamaria
    Luest, Dieter
    Zoupanos, George
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2024, 2024 (02)
  • [27] R2 quantum corrected scalar field inflation
    Oikonomou, V. K.
    Giannakoudi, Ifigeneia
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2022, 978
  • [28] R2 inflation revisited and dark energy corrections
    Odintsov, S. D.
    Oikonomou, V. K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 104 (12)
  • [29] Weyl R2 inflation with an emergent Planck scale
    Ghilencea, D. M.
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2019, 2019 (10)
  • [30] R2 should not be used to describe behavioral-economic discounting and demand models
    Gelino, Brett W.
    Strickland, Justin C.
    Johnson, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2024, 122 (02) : 117 - 138