Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Toledo-Chavarri, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [1 ]
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [2 ,5 ]
Trinanes Pego, Yolanda [6 ]
Serrano Aguilar, Pedro [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Canaria Inst Invest Sanit Canarias FIISC, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Galdakao, Spain
[3] Direcc Serv Canario Salud, Serv Evaluac & Planificac, Camino Candelaria S-N, Tenerife 38109, Spain
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing Sci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Serv Evaluac & Planificac Serv Canario Salud SESC, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[6] Avalia T, Axencia Conecemento Saude ACIS, Unidad Asesoramiento Cient Tecn, Serv Galego Saude, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Health Technology Assessment (HTA); Patient participation; Patient-based evidence; RedETS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462320001956
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. This paper aims to describe the development of a flowchart to guide the decisions of researchers in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) regarding patient involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By doing so, it reflects on current methodological challenges in PI in the HTA field: how best to combine PI methods and what is the role of patient-based evidence. Methods. A decisional flowchart for PI in HTA was developed between March and April 2019 following an iterative process, reviewed by the members of the PI Interest Group and other RedETS members and validated during an online deliberative meeting. The development of the flowchart was based on a previous methodological framework assessed in a pilot study. Results. The guidelines on how to involve patients in HTA in the RedETS were graphically represented in a flowchart. PI must be included in all HTA reports, except those that assess technologies with no relevant impact on patients' experiences, values, and preferences. Patient organizations or expert patients related to the topic of the HTA report must be identified and invited. These patients can participate in protocol development, outcomes' identification, assessment process, and report review. When the technology assessed affects in a relevant way patient experiences, values, and preferences, patient-based evidence should be included through a systematic literature review or a primary study. Conclusions. The decisional flowchart for PI in HTA contributes to the current methodological challenges by proposing a combination of direct involvement and patient-based evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An institutional ethnographic analysis of public and patient engagement activities at a national health technology assessment agency
    Bidonde, Julia
    Vanstone, Meredith
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Abelson, Julia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [42] Exploration of the visibility of patient input in final recommendation documentation for three health technology assessment bodies
    Wale, Janet L.
    Sullivan, Melissa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [43] Patient and citizen participation at the organizational level in health technology assessment: an exploratory study in five jurisdictions
    Nabarette, Herve
    Chastenay, Marie-Helene
    Dupont, Jean-Claude K.
    Ganache, Isabelle
    Single, Ann N. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [44] The politics of health technology assessment in Poland
    Ozieranski, Piotr
    McKee, Martin
    King, Lawrence
    HEALTH POLICY, 2012, 108 (2-3) : 178 - 193
  • [45] User Involvement in the Design and Development of Patient Decision Aids and Other Personal Health Tools: A Systematic Review
    Vaisson, Gratianne
    Provencher, Thierry
    Dugas, Michele
    Trottier, Marie-Eve
    Chipenda Dansokho, Selma
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Giguere, Anik M. C.
    Hakim, Hina
    Haslett, Lynne
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Julien, Anne-Sophie
    Legare, France
    Renaud, Jean-Sebastien
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert J.
    Witteman, Holly O.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (03) : 261 - 274
  • [46] CHANGING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PARADIGMS?
    Husereau, Don
    Henshall, Chris
    Sampietro-Colom, Laura
    Thomas, Sarah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (04) : 191 - 199
  • [47] Methodological approaches of health technology assessment
    Goodman, CS
    Ahn, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1999, 56 (1-3) : 97 - 105
  • [48] Patient involvement in clinical pathway development, implementation and evaluation - A scoping review of international literature
    Wind, Anke
    van der Linden, Christopher
    Hartman, Elmar
    Siesling, Sabine
    van Harten, Wim
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (06) : 1441 - 1448
  • [49] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: The developers’ perspective
    Bianca Wiering
    Dolf de Boer
    Diana Delnoij
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [50] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23