Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Toledo-Chavarri, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [1 ]
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [2 ,5 ]
Trinanes Pego, Yolanda [6 ]
Serrano Aguilar, Pedro [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Canaria Inst Invest Sanit Canarias FIISC, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Galdakao, Spain
[3] Direcc Serv Canario Salud, Serv Evaluac & Planificac, Camino Candelaria S-N, Tenerife 38109, Spain
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing Sci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Serv Evaluac & Planificac Serv Canario Salud SESC, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[6] Avalia T, Axencia Conecemento Saude ACIS, Unidad Asesoramiento Cient Tecn, Serv Galego Saude, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Health Technology Assessment (HTA); Patient participation; Patient-based evidence; RedETS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462320001956
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. This paper aims to describe the development of a flowchart to guide the decisions of researchers in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) regarding patient involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By doing so, it reflects on current methodological challenges in PI in the HTA field: how best to combine PI methods and what is the role of patient-based evidence. Methods. A decisional flowchart for PI in HTA was developed between March and April 2019 following an iterative process, reviewed by the members of the PI Interest Group and other RedETS members and validated during an online deliberative meeting. The development of the flowchart was based on a previous methodological framework assessed in a pilot study. Results. The guidelines on how to involve patients in HTA in the RedETS were graphically represented in a flowchart. PI must be included in all HTA reports, except those that assess technologies with no relevant impact on patients' experiences, values, and preferences. Patient organizations or expert patients related to the topic of the HTA report must be identified and invited. These patients can participate in protocol development, outcomes' identification, assessment process, and report review. When the technology assessed affects in a relevant way patient experiences, values, and preferences, patient-based evidence should be included through a systematic literature review or a primary study. Conclusions. The decisional flowchart for PI in HTA contributes to the current methodological challenges by proposing a combination of direct involvement and patient-based evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health technology assessment use and dissemination by patient and consumer groups: Why and how?
    Fattal, Julie
    Lehoux, Pascale
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 24 (04) : 473 - 480
  • [32] Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocol
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Candas, Bernard
    Desmartis, Marie
    Gagnon, Johanne
    La Roche, Daniel
    Rhainds, Marc
    Coulombe, Martin
    Dipankui, Mylene Tantchou
    Legare, France
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [33] What Is Next for Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment? A Systematic Review of the Challenges
    Huls, Samare P. I.
    Whichello, Chiara L.
    van Exel, Job
    Uyl-de Groot, Carin A.
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (11) : 1318 - 1328
  • [34] Development and testing of a medline search filter for identifying patient and public involvement in health research
    Rogers, Morwenna
    Bethel, Alison
    Boddy, Kate
    HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (02): : 125 - 133
  • [35] Involvement of patients of healthcare systems in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): a narrative review of international strategies
    Castro, Rosana
    Silva Elias, Flavia Tavares
    INTERFACE-COMUNICACAO SAUDE EDUCACAO, 2018, 22 (64): : 97 - 108
  • [36] A Pilot Study to Identify Areas for Further Improvements in Patient and Public Involvement in Health Technology Assessments for Medicines
    Messina, Josie
    Grainger, David. L.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (03): : 199 - 211
  • [37] Patient and societal indicators for mHealth apps' evaluation using Health Technology Assessment framework
    Katsaliaki, Korina
    Kumar, Sameer
    Galetsi, Panagiota
    TECHNOVATION, 2025, 140
  • [38] A HTA of what? Reframing through including patient perspectives in health technology assessment processes
    Gunn, Callum J. J.
    Regeer, Barbara J. J.
    Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [39] Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all
    Tambuyzer, Else
    Pieters, Guido
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (01) : 138 - 150
  • [40] Organizational and systemic conditions of citizen-patient involvement in the development of telehealth in Quebec
    Alami, Hassane
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Fortin, Jean-Paul
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2019, 31 (01): : 125 - 135