Comparative analysis of path computation techniques for MPLS traffic engineering

被引:42
|
作者
Banerje, G [1 ]
Sidhu, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Maryland Ctr Telecommun Res, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
来源
COMPUTER NETWORKS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKING | 2002年 / 40卷 / 01期
关键词
traffic engineering; path computation; multi-constrained path; QoS; MPLS;
D O I
10.1016/S1389-1286(02)00270-0
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of computing traffic engineered paths for requests having bandwidth and delay requirements, when these requests arrive in the network independent of one another. Providing bandwidth guarantees to applications has been important in networks offering service differentiation. With the increase in the number of real-time applications in the Internet, provision of delay guarantees is also receiving much attention. This necessitates the development of sophisticated path selection algorithms which deviate from the shortest-path routing philosophy in traditional IP networks. While these algorithms perform well from the perspective of satisfying application requirements, they often do not take into account long term effects on the network state. One of the major concerns of a service provider is to run the network at maximum utilization while reducing network costs and preventing congestion in the network. For this reason, providers are looking at traffic engineering (TE) to automate path selection procedures and to maintain network loading at an optimal level. In this paper we propose two TE path selection algorithms that consider the application's delay-bandwidth requirements as well as the TE constraints on the network. We compare the proposed algorithms to existing path computation solutions and present results that show that by considering these additional constraints, improvement is achieved in terms of reduction in request blocking probability, reduction in network costs and load distribution. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 165
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Path computation for traffic engineering in MPLS networks
    Banerjee, G
    Sidhu, D
    NETWORKING - ICN 2001, PART II, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 2094 : 302 - 308
  • [2] A Path Computation algorithm in MPLS Traffic Engineering for reducing blocking probability
    Mohrehkesh, S
    Yousefi, S
    Fathy, M
    PERFORMANCE CHALLENGES FOR EFFICIENT NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS, VOLS 6A-6C, 2005, 6A-6C : 801 - 808
  • [3] Analysis of two-phase path management scheme for MPLS traffic engineering
    Tamura, H
    Kawahara, K
    Oie, Y
    PERFORMANCE, QUALITY OF SERVICE, AND CONTROL OF NEXT-GENERATION COMMUNICATION NETWORKS II, 2004, 5598 : 194 - 203
  • [4] Analysis of Two-Phase Path Management Scheme for MPLS Traffic Engineering
    Tamura, Hitomi
    Kawahara, Kenji
    Oie, Yuji
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, E92B (01) : 59 - 67
  • [5] Analysis of MPLS traffic engineering
    Chung, JM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 43RD IEEE MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS I-III, 2000, : 550 - 553
  • [6] Traffic engineering for MPLS
    Lai, WS
    INTERNET PERFORMANCE AND CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS III, 2002, 4865 : 256 - 267
  • [7] Loop-free traffic engineering with path protection in MPLS VPNs
    Naraghi-Pour, Mort
    Desai, Vinay
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2008, 52 (12) : 2360 - 2372
  • [8] Strategy-based path selection for traffic engineering over MPLS
    Li, L
    Li, YC
    Yamada, H
    2004 IEEE WORKSHOP ON IP OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT PROCEEDINGS (IPOM 2004): SELF-MEASUREMENT & SELF-MANAGEMENT OF IP NETWORKS & SERVICES, 2004, : 55 - 59
  • [9] MPLS/VPN traffic engineering: SLA metrics
    Cherkaoui, O
    MacGibbon, B
    Blais, M
    Serhouchni, A
    TECHNOLOGIES, PROTOCOLS, AND SERVICES FOR NEXT-GENERATION INTERNET, 2001, 4527 : 80 - 90
  • [10] Traffic Engineering and QoS in a Proposed MPLS-VPN
    Gales, Ema-Maria
    Croitoru, Victor
    2020 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS (ISETC), 2020, : 379 - 382