Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Hoxha, Ilir [1 ,2 ]
Syrogiannouli, Lamprini [2 ]
Luta, Xhyljeta [1 ]
Tal, Kali [1 ,2 ]
Goodman, David C. [1 ,3 ]
da Costa, Bruno R. [2 ]
Juni, Peter [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Primary Hlth Care, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[4] Univ Toronto, AHRC, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, St Michaels Hosp,Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; BREECH PRESENTATION; HEALTH-CARE; DELIVERY; RATES; BIRTH; RISK; TERM; PREGNANCY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Financial incentives may encourage private for-profit providers to perform more caesarean section (CS) than non-profit hospitals. We therefore sought to determine the association of for-profit status of hospital and odds of CS. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the first year of records through February 2016. Eligibility criteria: To be eligible, studies had to report data to allow the calculation of ORs of CS comparing private for-profit hospitals with public or private non-profit hospitals in a specific geographic area. Outcomes: The prespecified primary outcome was the adjusted OR of births delivered by CS in private for profit hospitals as compared with public or private non-profit hospitals; the prespecified secondary outcome was the crude OR of CS in private for-profit hospitals as compared with public or private non-profit hospitals. Results: 15 articles describing 17 separate studies in 4.1 million women were included. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, the adjusted odds of delivery by CS was 1.41 higher in for-profit hospitals as compared with non-profit hospitals (95% CI 1.24 to 1.60) with no relevant heterogeneity between studies (tau(2)>= 0.037). Findings were robust across subgroups of studies in stratified analyses. The meta-analysis of crude estimates from 16 studies revealed a somewhat more pronounced association (pooled OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.27) with moderate-to-high heterogeneity between studies (tau(2)>= 0.179). Conclusions: CS are more likely to be performed by for-profit hospitals as compared with non-profit hospitals. This holds true regardless of women's risk and contextual factors such as country, year or study design. Since financial incentives are likely to play an important role, we recommend examination of incentive structures of for-profit hospitals to identify strategies that encourage appropriate provision of CS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries
    Hoxha, Ilir
    Zhubi, Esra
    Grezda, Krenare
    Kryeziu, Blerta
    Bunjaku, Jeta
    Sadiku, Fitim
    Agahi, Riaz
    Lungu, Daniel Adrian
    Bonciani, Manila
    Little, George
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [2] Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Devereaux, PJ
    Heels-Ansdell, D
    Lacchetti, C
    Haines, T
    Burns, KEA
    Cook, DJ
    Ravindran, N
    Walter, SD
    McDonald, H
    Stone, SB
    Patel, R
    Bhandari, M
    Schunemann, HJ
    Choi, PTL
    Bayoumi, AM
    Lavis, JN
    Sullivan, T
    Stoddart, G
    Guyatt, GH
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (12) : 1817 - 1824
  • [3] A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals
    Devereaux, PJ
    Choi, PTL
    Lacchetti, C
    Weaver, B
    Schünemann, HJ
    Haines, T
    Lavis, JN
    Grant, BJB
    Haslam, DRS
    Bhandari, M
    Sullivan, T
    Cook, DJ
    Walter, SD
    Meade, M
    Khan, H
    Bhatnager, N
    Guyatt, GH
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 166 (11) : 1399 - 1406
  • [4] Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoxha, Ilir
    Syrogiannouli, Lamprini
    Braha, Medina
    Goodman, David C.
    da Costa, Bruno R.
    Juni, Peter
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [5] Mortality at For-Profit Versus Not-For-Profit Hemodialysis Centers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dickman, Samuel
    Mirza, Reza
    Kandi, Maryam
    Incze, Michael A.
    Dodbiba, Lorin
    Yameen, Raad
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Zhang, Ying
    Kamran, Rakhshan
    Couban, Rachel
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Hanna, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2021, 51 (03): : 371 - 378
  • [6] Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Comondore, Vikram R.
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Zhou, Qi
    Stone, Samuel B.
    Busse, Jason W.
    Ravindran, Nikila C.
    Burns, Karen E.
    Haines, Ted
    Stringer, Bernadette
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Walter, Stephen D.
    Sullivan, Terrence
    Berwanger, Otavio
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Banglawala, Sarfaraz
    Lavis, John N.
    Petrisor, Brad
    Schuenemann, Holger
    Walsh, Katie
    Bhatnagar, Neera
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 381 - 384
  • [7] Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers -: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Devereaux, PJ
    Schünemann, HJ
    Ravindran, N
    Bhandari, M
    Garg, AX
    Choi, PTL
    Grant, BJB
    Haines, T
    Lacchetti, C
    Weaver, B
    Lavis, JN
    Cook, DJ
    Haslam, DRS
    Sullivan, T
    Guyatt, GH
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (19): : 2449 - 2457
  • [8] For-Profit Hospital Status and Rehospitalizations at Different Hospitals: An Analysis of Medicare Data
    Kind, Amy J. H.
    Bartels, Christie
    Mell, Matthew W.
    Mullahy, John
    Smith, Maureen
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 153 (11) : 718 - 727
  • [9] Robson ten group classification system for Caesarean sections across Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    El Radaf, Viktoria
    Campos, Leticia Nunes
    Savona-Ventura, Charles
    Mahmood, Tahir
    Zaigham, Mehreen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 305 : 178 - 198
  • [10] Office hours and caesarean section: systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Ilir Hoxha
    Arber Lama
    Genta Bunjaku
    Krenare Grezda
    Riaz Agahi
    Petrit Beqiri
    David C. Goodman
    Research in Health Services & Regions, 1 (1):