Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters

被引:182
作者
Walshe, LJ [1 ]
Malak, SF [1 ]
Eagan, J [1 ]
Sepkowitz, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Clin Infect Dis Sect, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2002.11.135
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose : Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently used to deliver outpatient courses of intravenous therapy. However, the rates and risks of complication for this device have not been well-studied. Our objective was to determine the incidence and risk factors of PICC-related complications with a 1-year prospective observational study. Patients and Methods: All PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were followed prospectively. The device insertion team, inpatient nurses, and various home-care companies and outside institutions collected longitudinal data. Results: Three hundred fifty-one PICCs were inserted during the study period and followed for a total of 10,562 catheter-days (median placement, 15 days; range, 1 to 487 days). Two hundred five PICCs (58%) were managed by home-care companies and outside institutions, and 146 PICCs (42%) were managed exclusively at MSKCC. For these 205 PICCs, 131 nurses from 74 home-care companies and institutions were contacted for follow-up clinical information. In all, 115 (32.8%) of 351 PICCs were removed as a result of a complication, for a rate of 10.9 per 1,000 catheter-days. Patients with hematologic malignancy or bone marrow transplant were more likely to develop a complication, whereas those with metastatic disease were less likely. Conclusion: Complications occur frequently among cancer patients with PICCs, and long-term follow-up is onerous. Despite a high complication rate, the ease of insertion and removal argues for continued PICC use in the cancer population. (C) 2002 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3276 / 3281
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ABINADER JA, 1993, HEART LUNG, V22, P428
[2]  
BOTTINO J, 1979, CANCER, V43, P1937, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197905)43:5<1937::AID-CNCR2820430554>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-T
[4]   Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution [J].
Cardella, JF ;
Cardella, K ;
Bacci, N ;
Fox, PS ;
Post, JH .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (01) :5-13
[5]   Peripherally inserted central catheters in infants and children [J].
Dubois, J ;
Garel, L ;
Tapiero, B ;
Dube, J ;
Laframboise, S ;
David, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (03) :622-626
[6]   Peripherally inserted central catheters for parenteral nutrition: A comparison with centrally inserted catheters [J].
Duerksen, DR ;
Papineau, N ;
Siemens, J ;
Yaffe, C .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1999, 23 (02) :85-89
[7]  
Graham DR, 1991, AM J MED S3B, V91, P95
[8]   INFECTIOUS MORBIDITY ASSOCIATED WITH LONG-TERM USE OF VENOUS ACCESS DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER [J].
GROEGER, JS ;
LUCAS, AB ;
THALER, HT ;
FRIEDLANDERKLAR, H ;
BROWN, AE ;
KIEHN, TE ;
ARMSTRONG, D .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (12) :1168-1174
[9]   PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS IN AN ACUTE-CARE HOSPITAL [J].
LAM, S ;
SCANNELL, R ;
ROESSLER, D ;
SMITH, MA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (16) :1833-1837
[10]   EVALUATION OF SILICONE ELASTOMER CATHETERS FOR LONG-TERM INTRAVENOUS CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
LEGHA, SS ;
HAQ, M ;
RABINOWITS, M ;
LAWSON, M ;
MCCREDIE, K .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 145 (07) :1208-1211