Hybrid sampling strategy-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for process planning and scheduling problem

被引:56
作者
Zhang, Wenqiang [1 ]
Gen, Mitsuo [2 ,3 ]
Jo, Jungbok [4 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Technol, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
[2] FLSI, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Engn Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[4] Dongseo Univ, Div Comp & Informat Engn, Pusan, South Korea
关键词
Evolutionary algorithm; Vector evaluated genetic algorithm (VEGA); Hybrid sampling; Multiobjective optimization; Process planning and scheduling; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; DOMINANT GENES; INTEGRATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10845-013-0814-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Process planning and scheduling (PPS) is an important and practical topic but very intractable problem in manufacturing systems. Many research studies used multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) to solve such problems; however, they cannot achieve satisfactory results in both quality and computational speed. This paper proposes a hybrid sampling strategy-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (HSS-MOEA) to deal with the PPS problem. HSS-MOEA tactfully combines the advantages of vector evaluated genetic algorithm (VEGA) and a sampling strategy according to a new Pareto dominating and dominated relationship-based fitness function (PDDR-FF). The sampling strategy of VEGA prefers the edge region of the Pareto front and PDDR-FF-based sampling strategy has the tendency converging toward the central area of the Pareto front. These two mechanisms preserve both the convergence rate and the distribution performance. The numerical comparisons state that the HSS-MOEA is better than a generalized Pareto-based scale-independent fitness function based genetic algorithm combing with VEGA in efficacy (convergence and distribution) performance, while the efficiency is closely equivalent. Moreover, the efficacy performance of HSS-MOEA is also better than NSGA-II and SPEA2, and the efficiency is obviously better than their performance.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 897
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS WRIGHT PATTER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 103 ETH ZUR
[3]   An introduction of dominant genes in genetic algorithm for FMS [J].
Chan, F. T. S. ;
Chung, S. H. ;
Chan, L. Y. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (16) :4369-4389
[4]   The relevance of outsourcing and leagile strategies in performance optimization of an integrated process planning and scheduling model [J].
Chan, F. T. S. ;
Kumar, V. ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2009, 47 (01) :119-142
[5]   Application of genetic algorithms with dominant genes in a distributed scheduling problem in flexible manufacturing systems [J].
Chan, FTS ;
Chung, SH ;
Chan, PLY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2006, 44 (03) :523-543
[6]   An adaptive genetic algorithm with dominated genes for distributed scheduling problems [J].
Chan, FTS ;
Chung, SH ;
Chan, PLY .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2005, 29 (02) :364-371
[7]   An adapted NSGA-2 algorithm based dynamic process plan generation for a reconfigurable manufacturing system [J].
Chaube, A. ;
Benyoucef, L. ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2012, 23 (04) :1141-1155
[8]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[9]  
Deb K., 2010, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
[10]  
Fonseca C. M., 1996, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN IV. International Conference on Evolutionary Computation - The 4th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Proceedings, P584, DOI 10.1007/3-540-61723-X_1022